Pfizer Vaccine Dangers for Pregnant Women – A Letter to Massachusetts Attorney General
Pfizer Vaccine Dangers for Pregnant Women –
A Letter to Massachusetts Attorney General
June 9, 2022
Attorney General Maura Healey
Office of the Attorney General
One Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108
Re: Pfizer-BioNTech experimental mRNA vaccine adverse events for pregnant women
Dear Attorney General Healey:
On January 6, 2022, a federal judge in Texas ordered the FDA to release the Pfizer-BioNTech
documentation relied upon to provide the emergency use authorization for the experimental
mRNA vaccine. The order came after the nonprofit group, the Public Health and Medical
Professionals for Transparency, filed a FOIA request requesting the documentation.
The FDA initially attempted to delay the production of the documents for 75 years in response to
this FOIA request. However, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman, Fort Worth, TX, denied the FDA
request ruling: “there may not be a more important issue at the Food and Drug
Administration …. than the pandemic, the Pfizer vaccine, getting every American vaccinated”
and assuring the public that the vaccine was not “rushed on behalf of the United States.” He then
concluded that “this FOIA request is of paramount public importance.” Judge Pittman stressed the
importance of an informed citizenry and full disclosure and ordered the FDA to release 12,000 pages
before the end of January 2022 and 55,000 pages every month until production was
completed (450,000 pages).
The Pfizer documents show participants suffered multiple adverse events after taking the
experimental mRNA vaccine. These adverse events were previously unknown to the public, and
Pfizer has directly and unequivocally acknowledged many of the events. The data is
exceptionally alarming and includes reports of death in many cases.
The public has an absolute right to know all of the FDA and Pfizer information concerning the
experimental mRNA vaccine risks. However, for one particularly vulnerable group, women who
are or may become pregnant, information has not been forthcoming from Pfizer, the FDA, the
government, or the news media. The FDA and Pfizer have a moral, ethical, and legal obligation
to make sure that this critically important information makes its way to the public at large, to
ensure that pregnant women are armed with the most accurate data available regarding the
experimental mRNA vaccine so they can make an informed judgment on whether to take the
vaccine. It is not sufficient for the FDA and Pfizer to release this data piecemeal through Judge
The FDA’s emergency use authorization of Pfizer’s-BioNTech mRNA vaccine data on December
11, 2020, mandated that Pfizer submit adverse event reports to the FDA. On April 30, 2021,
Pfizer reported on the effects of the vaccine in pregnant patients and concluded that a “review of
the available data . . . confirms a favorable benefit/risk balance”.
In the May 2, 2022 release of the Pfizer documents (reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience. pdf
page 12), data showed that 270 pregnant women had received the experimental mRNA vaccine.
124 of the 270 vaccinated mothers had an adverse reaction after taking the vaccine: 49 were
non-serious, and 75 were serious. (Note: different outcomes were reported for each twin ).
Interestingly, there are no reported outcomes for 238 of these pregnancies. However, the data on
the 36 fetuses/babies’ outcome is dire. Of the 28 cases reported, 25 of the fetuses/ babies’ died
before birth and three died at birth. Those deaths were described as follows:
- Twenty-three spontaneous abortions
- Two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death
- Two premature births with neonatal death
- One spontaneous abortion with neonatal death
Consequently, 28 out of the 36 fetuses/babies with known outcomes died at or before
birth—resulting in a 78% mortality rate! Also, the missing 238 pregnancy outcomes beg the
question: Why did Pfizer fail to provide the data on these cases?
The CDC and Pfizer claim that the Pfizer vaccine is safe for pregnant women and their babies
(See, US Centers for Disease Control,
However, we now know from the May 2, 2022 release that this is not only untrue but fraudulent.
Pregnant women are being encouraged, and in some cases mandated, to take the experimental
mRNA vaccine, despite the unreasonable risk while crucial information is being withheld. These
women are entitled to complete disclosure of all potential risks of the experimental mRNA
vaccine while pregnant.
As the Attorney General of Massachusetts, you have the authority, and the obligation, under the
Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 93A) to protect
the public and prevent “unfair or deceptive acts or practices. against consumers” The documents
demonstrate that the FDA and Pfizer knew this critically important information but failed to
disclose or convey it to the public. Information was intentionally withheld while the FDA and Pfizer
repeatedly put forth the false contention that the experimental mRNA vaccine is safe.
We hereby request that you take immediate action against Pfizer to enjoin them from distributing
the experimental mRNA vaccines until the required proper warnings of known vaccine side
effects are provided to consumers. Massachusetts pregnant women have a right to be informed of
all known or potential vaccine risks that could impact their decision to take the Pfizer-BioNTech
experimental mRNA vaccine. Thank you for your time.