Pfizer Vaccine Dangers for Pregnant Women – A Letter to Massachusetts Attorney General

Pfizer Vaccine Dangers for Pregnant Women –

A Letter to Massachusetts Attorney General

June 9, 2022

 

Attorney General Maura Healey

Office of the Attorney General

One Ashburton Place

20th Floor

Boston, MA 02108

 

Re: Pfizer-BioNTech experimental mRNA vaccine adverse events for pregnant women

 

Dear Attorney General Healey:

 

On January 6, 2022, a federal judge in Texas ordered the FDA to release the Pfizer-BioNTech

documentation relied upon to provide the emergency use authorization for the experimental

mRNA vaccine. The order came after the nonprofit group, the Public Health and Medical

Professionals for Transparency, filed a FOIA request requesting the documentation.

 

The FDA initially attempted to delay the production of the documents for 75 years in response to

this FOIA request. However, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman, Fort Worth, TX, denied the FDA

request ruling: “there may not be a more important issue at the Food and Drug

Administration …. than the pandemic, the Pfizer vaccine, getting every American vaccinated”

and assuring the public that the vaccine was not “rushed on behalf of the United States.” He then

concluded that “this FOIA request is of paramount public importance.” Judge Pittman stressed the

importance of an informed citizenry and full disclosure and ordered the FDA to release 12,000 pages

before the end of January 2022 and 55,000 pages every month until production was

completed (450,000 pages).

 

The Pfizer documents show participants suffered multiple adverse events after taking the

experimental mRNA vaccine. These adverse events were previously unknown to the public, and

Pfizer has directly and unequivocally acknowledged many of the events. The data is

exceptionally alarming and includes reports of death in many cases.

 

The public has an absolute right to know all of the FDA and Pfizer information concerning the

experimental mRNA vaccine risks. However, for one particularly vulnerable group, women who

are or may become pregnant, information has not been forthcoming from Pfizer, the FDA, the

government, or the news media. The FDA and Pfizer have a moral, ethical, and legal obligation

to make sure that this critically important information makes its way to the public at large, to

ensure that pregnant women are armed with the most accurate data available regarding the

experimental mRNA vaccine so they can make an informed judgment on whether to take the

vaccine. It is not sufficient for the FDA and Pfizer to release this data piecemeal through Judge

Pittman’s Order.

 

The FDA’s emergency use authorization of Pfizer’s-BioNTech mRNA vaccine data on December

11, 2020, mandated that Pfizer submit adverse event reports to the FDA. On April 30, 2021,

Pfizer reported on the effects of the vaccine in pregnant patients and concluded that a “review of

the available data . . . confirms a favorable benefit/risk balance”.

(https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf)

 

In the May 2, 2022 release of the Pfizer documents (reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience. pdf

page 12), data showed that 270 pregnant women had received the experimental mRNA vaccine.

124 of the 270 vaccinated mothers had an adverse reaction after taking the vaccine: 49 were

non-serious, and 75 were serious. (Note: different outcomes were reported for each twin ).

Interestingly, there are no reported outcomes for 238 of these pregnancies. However, the data on

the 36 fetuses/babies’ outcome is dire. Of the 28 cases reported, 25 of the fetuses/ babies’ died

before birth and three died at birth. Those deaths were described as follows:

 

• Twenty-three spontaneous abortions
• Two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death
• Two premature births with neonatal death
• One spontaneous abortion with neonatal death

 

Consequently, 28 out of the 36 fetuses/babies with known outcomes died at or before

birth—resulting in a 78% mortality rate! Also, the missing 238 pregnancy outcomes beg the

question: Why did Pfizer fail to provide the data on these cases?

 

The CDC and Pfizer claim that the Pfizer vaccine is safe for pregnant women and their babies

(See, US Centers for Disease Control,

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/pregnancy.html).

However, we now know from the May 2, 2022 release that this is not only untrue but fraudulent.

Pregnant women are being encouraged, and in some cases mandated, to take the experimental

mRNA vaccine, despite the unreasonable risk while crucial information is being withheld. These

women are entitled to complete disclosure of all potential risks of the experimental mRNA

vaccine while pregnant.

 

As the Attorney General of Massachusetts, you have the authority, and the obligation, under the

Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act (Massachusetts General Laws, chapter 93A) to protect

the public and prevent “unfair or deceptive acts or practices. against consumers” The documents

demonstrate that the FDA and Pfizer knew this critically important information but failed to

disclose or convey it to the public. Information was intentionally withheld while the FDA and Pfizer

repeatedly put forth the false contention that the experimental mRNA vaccine is safe.

 

We hereby request that you take immediate action against Pfizer to enjoin them from distributing

the experimental mRNA vaccines until the required proper warnings of known vaccine side

effects are provided to consumers. Massachusetts pregnant women have a right to be informed of

all known or potential vaccine risks that could impact their decision to take the Pfizer-BioNTech

experimental mRNA vaccine. Thank you for your time.