“What Would It Look Like? If the Vaccine Skeptics Are Correct”
Note: Thank you to Ashmedai for the input and collaboration.
What would it look like if the Covid vaccines are causing much more harm than we were told they would? The hardcore vaccine enthusiasts have such fierce tunnel vision that they explain away every signal that the Substack warriors have been exploring for the past 2 years.
I know we’ve all grown weary of the constant debate, and many of us have retreated into our own corners of information exploration, simply because it’s too exhausting to keep going in circles with people who absolutely refuse to consider any piece of information that doesn’t get presented to them in a “peer-reviewed study.” Don’t get me wrong – obviously, peer-reviewed studies are important, and when properly done, and without potential or direct conflicts of interest, they’re the cornerstone of scientific safety and development. Unfortunately, for those who are still desperate to believe that the Covid vaccines are a modern-day miracle that eased the pain of the pandemic, no “unsanctioned” information will be allowed passed their mental and emotional barrier.
A New Angle
When we debate with someone about the vaccine outcome, we should begin by asking 2 questions:
- Do you believe there’s any chance that the “anti-vaxxers” could possibly be correct in their claim that the vaccines are not safe and effective? In other words, do adverse events from the vaccine exist in larger numbers than government health officials admit to?
If the response is an immediate no – there’s nothing to further discuss. You can’t debate with someone about a subject where they enter the debate with a 100% closed mind to the possibility that you have valid information to share with them. If they admit that there’s a chance that our claim is true, we should follow up with:
2. How would the outcome play out in real life if the vaccines are causing much more harm than we were told?
The answer is unfortunately unfolding pretty much exactly how a logical mind would expect. If the vaccines are indeed more harmful than we were told, non-Covid deaths and injuries would be elevated in a noticeable way, with a correlation to vaccination. It seems so simple and horrific at the same time, that it’s both easy and difficult to understand why so many people are still blind to it.
For those who wave off the debate as moot, because the vaccine issue is behind us – they’re lucky that their lives or the lives of a loved one didn’t get destroyed or cut short after taking the vaccine. I would love to be as optimistic as someone who thinks that we’ve reached the end of the road in terms of mandated vaccines and medical tyranny, but we have to prepare for the possibility that we’re still in the beginning stages of medical authoritarianism.
Meanwhile, after two years of being mocked, blocked, ridiculed, and gaslit, it seems to me that finally, the truth and the findings of the people who have been shoved into underground media are becoming too large to ignore.
Continue Reading
One of our country’s most important freedoms is that of free speech.
Agree with this essay? Disagree? Join the debate by writing to DailyClout HERE.
Great! I’ve been growing 100 bucks accomplice hour due to the fact I commenced freelance at the net six months ago. I paintings lengthy hours each day from domestic and do the important paintings that i purchase from the commercial enterprise I met online. percentage this be just right for you (vwf-04) hazard that is frequently absolutely the best job
I actually have ever completed pass to this link———->>> http://xurl.es/pay1
From Hecht’s article:
“You can’t debate with someone about a subject where they enter the debate with a 100% closed mind to the possibility that you have valid information to share with them.”
Right. As the saying goes: “Never argue with stupid people–they will bring you down to their level, and then beat you with experience.” 😉