‘The One Chart That Tells the Entire Story’: Analysis Shows 26% Worse Mortality Among the MRNA Vaccinated
“The people who are under the age of 50 who took the vaccine now have a 49% higher mortality rate.”
‘COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work and Possible Causes of Injuries’. That’s the title on the agenda today (December 7, 2022), as Senator Ron Johnson holds a roundtable discussion of doctors, medical experts, and researchers in an effort to shed light on the current state of knowledge regarding the Covid-19 shot.
An enlightening speaker today was Josh Stirling, a highly-recognized insurance research analyst. And what he brought forth was “the one chart that tells the entire story.” Here it is:
“The UK Government, until this summer, was reporting a data series that showed the relative mortality rates for the vaccinated and unvaccinated by the number of doses of the vaccine,” stated Stirling.
“We’ve done what we think is really professional work with this. And we think it simplifies down to a conclusion that says that through the last available data set, the people in the UK who took the vaccine have a 26% higher mortality rate. The people who are under the age of 50 who took the vaccine now have a 49% higher mortality rate. And worst of all, the people who only took one dose of the vaccine at approximately 145% worse mortality rate.”
“That last data point is on its face confusing.”
“It just doesn’t make a ton of sense unless you realize that what’s going on with this really is that the people who took the dose, the first dose in the United States — that’s about 12% of people — but then stop taking any other doses, those people, through their choice to stop, disproportionately [were] the ones who are harmed,” explained Stirling.
“And so, what we’re concluding is that if you happen to be an unlucky person who was in some fashion, even moderately injured [or] with a minor injury [and] have decided not to continue, the statistics, the best statistics we have show that you’re gonna have, at least through today, maybe it’ll get better … but if that doesn’t happen we’d have to assume that this is now the baseline, there’s going to be 145% higher mortality. And if you were to take these numbers and just apply them to the United States, that ends up being something like 600,000 excess deaths per year in the United States from this higher vaccine-induced mortality.”
Those are truly horrifying numbers — but thank you, Josh, for your testimony and expertise.
If you’d like to tune into the rest of this eye-opening roundtable discussion, you can watch the entire video via the link below.
COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work and Possible Causes of Injuries
Thanks for reading.
This article has been republished from the author’s Substack.
The Vigilant Fox is a citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience, focused on The Great Reset, world protests, and COVID-19. After being deeply disturbed by COVID measures, mandates, and medical discrimination, he has dedicated his free time and effort to making short, informative clips featuring top doctors, scientists, and thought leaders from around the world.
One of our country’s most important freedoms is that of free speech.
Agree with this essay? Disagree? Join the debate by writing to DailyClout HERE.
Naomi,
You have balls of steel; congratulations.
Your parents did a great job.
One thing that the statistician didn’t quite put his finger on is that we are not looking at three different groups (of vaxxed) who received three different doses). We are looking at sequential exposure. The reason it looks like two doses is less harmful than one and three doses less harmful than two is because in the the two and three dose columns, these people are survivors. Everyone in the 2 and 3 dose column rolled the dice in the 1 dose column and survived. Those in the 3 dose column all survived two doses. The survivors are progressively less susceptible to the vax, undoubtedly at least partly by virtue of fortuitous genetics.