The Lancet Censored Science, Education, and Our Right to Informed Consent
Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Harvey Risch, and colleagues were censored by the formerly respected scientific journal The Lancet: their paper, removed within 24 hours, found that 74% of the deaths following mRNA vaccine injection were likely caused by the injection.
The Lancet Study: How It Started
Dr. McCullough, one of the most highly esteemed and credentialed cardiologists in the world, was contacted by a graduate student from the University of Michigan School of Public Health. Dr. McCullough, being a University Michigan Alum himself, was quickly accepted by the university as a mentor. The graduate student and Dr. McCullough then began working together on a project aimed at identifying all the published deaths that occurred after the mRNA vaccine.
They sifted through hundreds of papers, eventually narrowing their search to 44 papers containing 325 autopsies. Each case was reviewed by three experts, including the former president of Royal College of Pathology Dr. Roger Hodkinson. Two out of three of the experts needed to agree that the vaccine was either the direct cause of death or significantly contributed to death in order for the study to continue.
The paper was finalized and then moved forward into the submission process for publication. Dr. McCullough describes how the New England Journal of Medicine rejected the paper after a few days, while the Journal of American Medical Association rejected it within an hour. The only reasoning that was provided by the journals was that the study was not a priority for them.
The team also submitted to The Lancet. Dr. McCullough had previously published in The Lancet, so it would not be new territory. After about three days, The Lancet agreed to publish the study on their preprint server.
Overnight, the downloads of the full manuscript were by the hundreds per minute. Dr. McCullough attributes the enormous amount of interest to the amount of detail provided in the study’s evidence tables on the autopsies. The standard search methodology used in the study is a method in which Dr. McCullough has much experience.
Medical Censorship by The Lancet – But Who Called The Lancet?
Within 24 hours, the paper was swiftly and mysteriously removed. Only a note from The Lancet remained, reading:
“This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology…”
Unfortunately but unsurprisingly, for Dr. McCullough, Dr. Risch, and the other authors of the study, there were no courtesy editorial communications from The Lancet regarding the censorship of their study.
Dr. McCullough believes that the paper’s terrifying conclusion was the main reason for The Lancet’s removal of the paper. The conclusion? 73.9% of cases were directly caused by, or were significantly contributed to, by the mRNA-injection. In other words, of the autopsies consistent with mRNA injection injury, 74% of deaths were indeed mRNA injection-related. The mean timeline for the study was deaths that occurred within two weeks of injection.
What Caught Dr. McCullough’s Attention
The largest category of conditions post-vaccine is cardiac damage. The first category of cardiac-related injuries is myocarditis, heart inflammation of the muscle. Inflammation causes the electrical current not to conduct smoothly, causing a heart rhythm, and eventually causing sudden cardiac death.
Dr. McCullough explains that these attacks occur most often during exercise, when there is a surge of adrenaline, and between 3 a.m. and 6 a.m. when there is also a surge of adrenaline during the normal waking process.
Dr. McCullough mentions up-and-coming basketball player Oscar Cabrera Adames, who was taken out of competition due to being diagnosed with myocarditis.
Before returning to competition, Adames went to take a treadmill test to make sure he was ready to return to the sport. He died on the treadmill.
Dr. McCullough explains that, in his decades of experience as a cardiologist, he has never had a patient die on a treadmill test, as defibrillator paddles are always available on-site in the unlikely event of a heart attack.
The second category of cardiac-related injury post-mRNA injection is the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. An abstract published in 2021 by the American Heart Association measured a variety of blood factors known to be related to triggering an atherosclerotic plaque rupture in the arteries before and after the vaccine. The paper found “astronomical” elevations of these blood factors post-mRNA injection.
Before Covid — cardiac arrest cases of those under 35 totalled about 29 cases per year.
Since the mRNA-injections were released, and mandated on sports players, there are now 283 cases per year.
The Lancet Censored Science, Education, and Our Right to Informed Consent
How can we have informed consent if the opportunity to educate ourselves on a previously mandated, experimental drug is constantly being taken away by publications like The Lancet? How can we educate ourselves by doing our own research when that research is being censored by journals and media outlets? And finally, how can we have real, unbiased science when expert-reviewed studies with pages of detailed evidence are being tossed in the trash because the “conclusions are not supported” by the media? We cannot have science, truth, or informed consent without information.
Continue to stay informed, visit The Wellness Company to take charge of your health, and please support DailyClout so that we can continue to bring this information to your attention.
Learn More About The Wellness Company
Support DailyClout
Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!
One of our country’s most important freedoms is that of free speech.
Agree with this essay? Disagree? Join the debate by writing to DailyClout HERE.
Big Pharma and the quango formed with governments,, agencies,, and the money obsessed medical/hospital industry cannot have the truth out there or they’d be decorating tall trees and lamp posts and they know it.
Where is the study? I did not see a link to it. You do realize that you can publish outside of the official channels.
Good question from MarineVet – where is the study. It seems a good idea to publish it here. People could pass it on.