“The Answer to Population Control is Hidden in Plain Sight”

Big Pharma. Abortion. Child Transition. Experimental Vaccines. Gender Ideology. Smart Cities. Pandemic Lockdowns. Assisted Suicide. Pornography. Media Censorship. Climate Change. Harm Reduction. Secularism. 

You may recognize these as features of far-left ideology, also known as leftism, progressivism, wokeism, or neo-Marxism. 

But they are also components of something far more sinister – a global strategy of population control that transcends the political divide, pushed by those with an agenda to control, so that they may prevail. 

I’m talking about the technocrats, also known as the elites, the globalists, the careerists, or the Borg. 

This is not some fringe conspiracy about a New World Order. The emergence of a political class wedded to the monied class is no secret in Davos. Democratically elected governments have power but lack the means to instrumentalize that power. So, they have turned to the captains of industry, who control essential services within society, and merged their interests. 

It is these Malthusian powerbrokers who have led us to believe, for decades, that humanity is a burden on the planet, that we will ultimately run out of resources, and that the earth is too small to house everyone. 

Some of these members of the ruling class are ideologues. Some are mere opportunists. But they all have, whether they understand it as such, an insatiable thirst for power. And population control is the ruse by which they acquire such power. Hundreds of unsealed documents, meeting notes, books, reports, bills, and public conversations going back generations have shown this to be true. 

H.G. Wells, one of the founding members of the League of Nations and later an active proponent of the United Nations, wrote The Open Conspiracy, largely considered the precursor to the technocracy movement in the 1930s. Wells advocated for the dissolution of nation-states and the depopulation of certain groups in the service of an Anglo-American, one-world oligarchy: “It is impossible for any clear-headed person to suppose that the ever more destructive stupidities of war can be eliminated from human affairs until some common political control dominates the earth, and unless certain pressures due to the growth of population, due to the enlarging scope of economic operations or due to conflicting standards and traditions of life, are disposed of,” he wrote. “Intelligent control of population is a possibility which puts man outside competitive processes that have hitherto ruled the modification of species, and he can be released from these processes in no other way.”

In the 1960s, when roughly three billion people populated the earth, Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich and his disciples convinced my parents and countless others that resources would be depleted by 1975. Ehrlich’s “Population Bomb” argued that the earth’s carrying capacity was two billion people. Today, we see a world sustained with almost eight billion people, all of whom can fit into the state of Texas. And yet, more than 50 years later, Ehrlich remains committed to his thesis, implying that six billion people need to be disposed of. “It is a near certainty in the next few decades, and the risk is increasing continually as long as perpetual growth of the human enterprise remains the goal of economic and political systems,” he said in a recent interview. 

Ehrlich’s false predictions have been well cataloged, as has the alarmist prophesizing relating to depopulation and scarcity from thought leaders who have shaped social policy over the last century, from OG Thomas Malthus to Bill Gates, Henry Kissinger to Julian Huxley, David Rockefeller to Ted Turner. 

The influence of these industry, government, and academic leaders cannot be understated. Many joined international organizations such as the Bilderberg Group, the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Trilateral Commission, the United Nations (UN), The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), or The Club of Rome, to implement their designs, which, mostly recently, have manifested as Agenda 2030, which includes the 17 sustainable development goals and the 30×30 solution.

There is a huge overlap in membership amongst these shadowy groups. David Rockefeller was a key figure in the creation of the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg Group, as well as serving as chairman of the CFR and donor to the UN. Henry Kissinger has similarly been involved in the CFR, Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, and the WEF, while Zbigniew Brzezinski, an outspoken advocate of global governance and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, worked with the CFR, Club of Rome, and Bilderberg Group. “The technotronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values,” he wrote in his book Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Tecnetronic Era. Billionaire investor George Soros has also been involved in the CFR, the Club of Rome, and the WEF, and is a high-level member of the UN. Former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Paul Volcker was a member of the CFR, Trilateral Commission, and the UN, while former heads of state Bill Clinton and Angela Merkel have also been involved in the three groups. 

Curbing population growth has been a strategy refined and perfected over the years, conditioning so many of us to rest our heads at night thinking that we are on the right side of history by adopting such a worldview. And yet the call for population control is clearly misguided. What is occurring right now is precisely the opposite of what has been told to us. Our own national interests have moved us toward negative reproductive rates, so much so that nearly every single Western country has a declining birth index.  

In the 1980s, The Chinese Communist Party, desperate to curb its growing population, implemented its notorious “one-child” family policy. Today, as China’s inhabitants are contracting at a drastic rate and are no longer moving into cosmopolitan areas, the government is panicking and desperately trying to reverse its previous policy. China’s rise as an economic superpower depends on a growing consumer population.

Russia is facing a similar crisis, occupying vast territory, yet struggling to compete on the economic world stage with waning fertility. 

Left unmanipulated, population growth sets its own levels from society to society and goes through a natural balance of cycles, based on a variety of cultural and economic factors. But as more people are waking up to this deliberate effort to usurp the natural order and place it in a small group of human hands, recipes for stopping such a one-world, global government range from electing the right leaders, to curbing the destructive influence of drugs and porn, to homeschooling your kids, to purchasing guns, to eating healthy, and to buying our own land.

But there is a reply that is more graceful and fundamental. It is a prescription as old as time.

Family.

Getting married and having kids. Not only does this work in direct opposition to those pushing for depopulation, but it is also the best and most basic way to become independent from the government. It is an organic antidote to state control and overreach. Long before the modern phenomena of nation-states, there was family. Across all cultures, family is the primary unit of community, and the insurance of humanity’s lowest common denominator, which is to perpetuate our species. Family elevates that drive to a meaningful one, creating a departure from the animal species, as humans naturally look to create significance and possibility within certain social structures. 

Today, the state, in conjunction with its corporate mandarins, is in a struggle to replace the family. This tension between the concept of the state as a source of authority and the interest of the family takes many forms and is often at odds with each other. Contemporary illustrations of this include battles in states such as Virginia and California, where parents are passionately fighting against the public education system and state legislation that drives a wedge between them and their children, or President Biden’s scandalous remarks that “there’s no such thing as someone else’s child” and “Our nation’s children are all our children.” 

These attempts to de-personalize the family unit and to claim loyalty to the state above the rights of the parents are an interruption of individual control replaced with unitarian, collectivist demands. Government is a totalizing entity. It is meant to look over the totality of families, but it does not see value in the family process itself – only in terms of families being functionaries in carrying out the interests of government. The nuclear family is a threat to that hegemony because distance cannot replace the local. Community and familial bonds withstand any circumstance created by the government. It is through our lineage that we find meaning, and through parents’ determining, through their relationship with their children, how the future will be shaped by its heirs.

So, what are you waiting for? Get hitched.

Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!

• Email*

Δ

Jesse Friedman, popularly known as Hi-Rez, is a Bronx-born, Florida-raised hip-hop artist, known for his socially conscious lyrics and bold video content. With over a decade of touring, recording, and performing, he has released five mixtapes, a full-length album, and a series of provocative singles that have been virally dubbed as “meme music.”

Spread the Word