I don’t think you can have real proper debate without first agreeing to the terms. You should both first have the same facts upon which to build your individual cases. I think you would have had to take another hour at least to hash out foundational premises, such as whether or not the pandemic was planned from the outset, or whether or not effective early treatment drugs such as ivermectin were purposely suppressed, causing an estimated 500,000 Americans to die unnecessarily, or whether vaccines are helpful or harmful and if the harms were purposefully withheld. The answer to these questions make a huge difference to your debate. Another premise is whether or not politicians and officials in charge are under a foreign influence that poses a real totalitarian threat to the US. Only after studying the facts and coming to an agreement on this point can you properly discuss if the totalitarian scapegoat minority du jour, the unvaccinated, are at serious risk of becoming the next ‘holocaust’ victims.
Here in Canada the trucker convoy was talked about in government sessions calling us nazi inspired and someone placed a guy with a nazi flag on the steps of the government building but he did not walk around…so it was obvious he was a plant. I’m 70 and wonder if we have access to real History or just what the powers that be let us have. I look at Nazi in the same light as Fascism. Also Menticide is a real disease. The situation is huge and has many factures. Thanks for the discussion but we are going to be very busy for decades to come over this. Be Blessed.
Please review holocaust survivor, Vera Sharav, who likened forced Covid-19 vaccinations with similar medical experiments by Dr. Mengele during the NAZI years. Sharav is quoted as saying, “The government is doing what Mengele didn’t finish”.
Consider that it’s entirely appropriate to use the language of the holocaust as a warning to predict probable outcomes of America’s future.
Few will disagree the Nuremberg codes, derived from Nazi crimes, are currently violated on the issue of informed consent of Covid-19 vaccines.
To make the point to our current generation of potential victims, it becomes essential to use the term like “nazism” as the language of the holocaust in order to most effectively warn the pubic of crimes against humanity that violate the Nuremberg code.
Ms. Sharav was interviewed last February during the Grand Jury depositions held by the Covid Investigative Committee. Here is the video – https://tinyurl.com/mrywyu5z
I don’t think you can have real proper debate without first agreeing to the terms. You should both first have the same facts upon which to build your individual cases. I think you would have had to take another hour at least to hash out foundational premises, such as whether or not the pandemic was planned from the outset, or whether or not effective early treatment drugs such as ivermectin were purposely suppressed, causing an estimated 500,000 Americans to die unnecessarily, or whether vaccines are helpful or harmful and if the harms were purposefully withheld. The answer to these questions make a huge difference to your debate. Another premise is whether or not politicians and officials in charge are under a foreign influence that poses a real totalitarian threat to the US. Only after studying the facts and coming to an agreement on this point can you properly discuss if the totalitarian scapegoat minority du jour, the unvaccinated, are at serious risk of becoming the next ‘holocaust’ victims.
Here in Canada the trucker convoy was talked about in government sessions calling us nazi inspired and someone placed a guy with a nazi flag on the steps of the government building but he did not walk around…so it was obvious he was a plant. I’m 70 and wonder if we have access to real History or just what the powers that be let us have. I look at Nazi in the same light as Fascism. Also Menticide is a real disease. The situation is huge and has many factures. Thanks for the discussion but we are going to be very busy for decades to come over this. Be Blessed.
Please review holocaust survivor, Vera Sharav, who likened forced Covid-19 vaccinations with similar medical experiments by Dr. Mengele during the NAZI years. Sharav is quoted as saying, “The government is doing what Mengele didn’t finish”.
Consider that it’s entirely appropriate to use the language of the holocaust as a warning to predict probable outcomes of America’s future.
Few will disagree the Nuremberg codes, derived from Nazi crimes, are currently violated on the issue of informed consent of Covid-19 vaccines.
To make the point to our current generation of potential victims, it becomes essential to use the term like “nazism” as the language of the holocaust in order to most effectively warn the pubic of crimes against humanity that violate the Nuremberg code.
Ms. Sharav was interviewed last February during the Grand Jury depositions held by the Covid Investigative Committee. Here is the video – https://tinyurl.com/mrywyu5z