Journalists Naomi Wolf & Mark Steyn Silenced by British Media Regulator for Reporting the Truth
“Ofcom, finally, after seven months, decided I am in violation of their code … only a few days after Dr. Walensky resigned — after we broke the most horrific of these stories.”
“Today [Tuesday], I woke up to find that Ofcom, which is The United Kingdom’s media regulator … after a seven-month-long investigation of an interview that I gave to Mark Steyn last fall, that I had violated, and thus Mark Stein and GBNews, had violated its code,” lamented DailyClout CEO, Dr. Naomi Wolf.
The news came, as mentioned by Dr. Wolf, after a seven-month-long investigation following the airing of the below interviews between Naomi Wolf and Mark Steyn on October 4th and 5th.
“GB News has been sanctioned by Ofcom for the second time after the UK’s media regulator found that an interview with Naomi Wolf on the Mark Steyn show breached broadcasting rules,” reported The Epoch Times.
On Tuesday, an Ofcom investigation into the “Mark Steyn” programme, which first aired on GB News on Oct. 4, 2022, ruled Wolf’s “comments had the potential to impact viewers’ decisions about their health and were therefore potentially harmful.”
“GB News did not take adequate steps to protect viewers from this content, so we have found the channel in breach of the Broadcasting Code,” it added.
“Ofcom didn’t say I was wrong,” rebutted Dr. Wolf in her live stream video Tuesday evening.
“They didn’t say that what I said was inaccurate or factually in error. It isn’t. It’s correct,” she attested. “They basically said that I caused harm, that it was harmful, that I brought this information to the public.”
So what did Dr. Naomi Wolf say that Ofcom found so objectionable?
1.) There are lethal harms of the mRNA injections to mothers and babies.
— Source for Claim (Newest Information)
2.) Nazi doctors had prepared the way for the horrors that came later.
Dr. Wolf explained this point in great detail:
“I said on this notorious episode, and I stand by it, that the Nazi doctors had prepared the way for the horrors that came later, by early in the regime, or even before the Nazis were officially in power, creating categories of more and less valuable life. That is categorically true,” Dr. Wolf asserted.
“Anyone who has studied the period knows that it’s true. In fact, the National Socialists were very clever before they were formally elected to power in 1933. They were very clever by doing exactly what we’re seeing now: enlisting doctors, organizations, medical boards, [and] medical licensing boards to be their advance guard to bring this ideology of some life being better than other life. And it was the Nazi doctors, even before the Nazis were officially in power … who actually kind of innovated taking impaired teenagers away and never returning them to their families because they were unworthy of life. That is categorically true,” Dr. Wolf emphasized a second time.
“And I’m Jewish,” she added. “And my grandmother lost nine siblings in the Holocaust. So, the fact that Ofcom considers it “harmful” that a Jewish lady is telling the truth about Nazis is pretty extraordinary.”
“And I feel sad for Britain, the country I love, once the home of liberty, the innovator of liberty, that this media regulator is turning cartwheels of contortion to make the case that a Jewish lady warning about the early pre-Nazi period when National Socialist leaning doctors created divisions of better and worse life, that that’s harmful. You know, that is just strictly what happened in history. And if we’re not allowed to discuss what happened in history, things are very dark indeed, especially if we’re not allowed to discuss the rise of Nazism. Because if you — famous quote, George Santayana, “Those who [cannot remember the past], are condemned to repeat it.”
3.) Dr. Wolf said that the lipid nanoparticles degrade the testes of unborn baby boys of vaccinated moms and that they also degrade the Leydig cells and Sertoli cells.
4.) The lipid nanoparticles and mRNA enter the bloodstream.
Dr. Wolf then questioned the timing of Ofcom’s decision, which was temporally associated with one of the most damning Pfizer Reports yet: Report 69.
“Amy Kelly’s Report 69, explosive bombshell report, a story we broke last Sunday. And five days later, Rochelle Walensky resigned because otherwise, she’d have to answer questions about it. Report 69 from the Pfizer documents shows that, indeed, babies were getting poisoned to death by drinking their vaccinated mom’s breast milk. Why? Because there’s lipid nanoparticle and polyethylene glycol which coats the nanoparticle. This is a petroleum byproduct. It’s an antifreeze. Well, that’s now in vaccinated mom’s breast milk. I did not make this up … This is in the Pfizer documents,” she stressed.
“And I think it’s really interesting that Ofcom, finally, after seven months, decided I am in violation of their code for telling these truths only a few days after Dr. Walensky resigned — after we broke the most horrific of these stories.”
And this reason, Dr. Wolf suspects, is why “Ofcom is deciding after seven months that they really have to smear me categorically throughout Britain and make an example of me, and of Mark Stein and of GBNews — so as to chill any possible reporting by other news outlets of exactly this story, this news, this life-saving, very important news.”
Dr. Wolf’s full, written statement is available on her Substack.
And her full live stream video, in reaction to Ofcom’s decision, is available on her Twitter page.
The Financial Times, Newsweek, and many other outlets also covered this story. They did not reach out to Dr. Wolf for comment.
DailyClout Needs Your Support!
There’s heaps of corruption to expose and a lot of bad people to hold accountable, and we refuse to let the likes of Ofcom get in the way. But to reach our goals, we need grassroots support — as the people we are up against have nearly-unlimited funds.
So, if you’d like to support an organization with the know-how to make a real impact — and even the odds in the spiritual battle of our lifetime — please subscribe to our newsletter and make a donation today.
Subscribe to DailyClout
Make a Donation
Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!
One of our country’s most important freedoms is that of free speech.
Agree with this essay? Disagree? Join the debate by writing to DailyClout HERE.
Anyone who profited from and pushed for the experimental MRNA vaccines should be prosecuted for Crimes Against Humanity!
Is it possible to sue Ofcom for “HARMFUL” suppression of information? THEY are endangering pregnant women [we’ll ignore all the other people harmed by their censorship of true & accurate information about health risks of currently prevalent medical treatments]
THEY are guilty of the offense of which they accuse you and Mark Steyn. They should be held accountable. Is there recourse? As in offense may be the best defense.
(I’m sorry, I didn’t complete my thought before hitting enter)
WHO is beinng HARMED by the information you presented? (and, unintentional pun included — W.H.O. likely WOULD be harmed by the publication of this data, as they are complicit in recommending harmful administration).
Again who is harmed? Pfizer, certainly. For good reason. The pregnant women? NO. They are protected by information that informs their decision-making.
So the question WHO is “harmed” is highly relevant and should be asked as loudly and publicly as possible.