This is need-to-know information related to DailyClout’s lawsuit against Pfizer, CDC, NIH et al.

In addition to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) statute requiring recipients be informed of the known and potential benefits and risks of the product authorized under EUA (COVID-19 “vaccines”), they are to be informed of their right to refuse administration of the product (“vaccine.”)  [See:  Complaint par. 43 and 44] Implicit in the right to be informed of the right to refuse is the right to refuse itself. As the U.S. government did everything within its power to “encourage” mandatory “vaccinations” (by deception, coercion, duress or conferring of financial benefits) in the private sector and itself imposed, or attempted to impose, such mandates in federal employment and the military, its efforts were clearly calculated to override/undermine, and did in fact override/undermine, the right to refuse the “vaccine” in violation of the very statute under which the “vaccines” were authorized. Of course, the right to refuse treatment is explicitly recognized in the constitutional right to informed consent and bodily integrity as well.

Feel free to contact me with any questions.

Thanks,

George Smith