Report 89: BOMBSHELL – War Room/DailyClout Researchers Find Pfizer Delayed Recording Vaccinated Deaths at Critical Juncture of EUA Process. Improper Delays in Reporting Deaths in the Vaccinated Led FDA to Misstate Vaccine’s Effectiveness, Influenced EUA Grant Decision.
On September 5, 2023, DailyClout reported that a War Room/DailyClout Research Team – Corinne Michels, PhD; Daniel Perrier; Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, MD; Ed Clark, MSE; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Barbara Gehrett, MD; Kim Kwiatek, MD; Sarah Adams; Robert Chandler, MD; Leah Stagno; Tony Damian; Erika Delph; and Chris Flowers, MD – broke a huge story about there being more cardiovascular deaths in the vaccinated than in the unvaccinated in Pfizer’s clinical trial, as well as that Pfizer did not report the 3.7-fold cardiovascular adverse events signal and also delayed reporting deaths so that it favored the vaccinated arm of the trial. (https://dailyclout.io/report-84-warroom-dailyclout-research-team-breaks-huge-story/)
Now, as a follow up to that report, DailyClout reveals that Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, MD, part of that same Research Team, found even more damning evidence showing that Pfizer delayed recording deaths in Case Report Forms (CRFs), which allowed the company to not report those deaths as part of its emergency use authorization (EUA) data filing with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Daniel Perrier from the Research Team and Dr. Kunadhasan found, analyzed, and verified the data supporting this discovery. It is very likely that had the deaths been recorded when Pfizer became aware of them and then accurately filed as part of the EUA dataset, the public would not have accepted the FDA granting an EUA for Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 product.
On December 10, 2020, one day before the FDA granted Pfizer’s EUA, Susan Wollersheim, M.D. of the FDA/Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications, presented, “FDA Review of Efficacy and Safety of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization Request” at the CBER Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee 162nd Meeting. On page 42 of the slide deck, Dr. Wollersheim presented:
The data showing two vaccine deaths and four placebo deaths as of December 10, 2020, was incorrect at the time of the EUA request presentation, and the correct data was available in Pfizer’s own documentation and, thus, also available to the FDA.
As of November 14, 2020, the data cutoff for the EUA dataset, Pfizer possessed data showing that the vaccine arm of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine clinical trial had the same number of deaths as the placebo arm. In other words, there was no evidence of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine having a positive impact on death outcomes.
The Pfizer narrative descriptions of the deaths show that, though that the clinical trial sites had been informed by the deceased patients’ loved ones on the days of their deaths [October 19, 2020, and November 7, 2020 (pp. 71 and 75), well before the EUA data cutoff date in both cases], those two deaths from the vaccinated arm that were not included in the FDA presentation are listed below:
Case Report Forms (CRFs) capture patient data during a clinical trial. The CRFs for these two patients, Subjects 11141050 and 11201050, do not mention that Pfizer knew of their deaths on their dates of death. Rather, Subject 1141050’s death was first entered into the CRF on November 25, 2020, at 18:51:46 Central Time, 37 days after the patient’s death.
And, Subject 11201050’s death was first entered into the CRF on December 3, 2020, at 12:48:29 Eastern Time, 26 days after the patient died:
It appears that Pfizer not entering the death dates of the above two Subjects into their CRFs when Pfizer first learned of them – i.e., on the dates of death – allowed the company to hide the deaths until the EUA data cutoff date had passed. To summarize what was known and important dates:
According to Pfizer’s own protocol, reporting of deaths should have occurred within 24 hours:
- Section 8.3.1.1. “Reporting SAEs to Pfizer Safety” states, “All SAEs occurring in a participant during the active collection period as described in Section 8.3.1 are reported to Pfizer Safety on the Vaccine SAE Report Form immediately upon awareness and under no circumstance should this exceed 24 hours, as indicated in Appendix 3 [pp. 1271-1277]. The investigator will submit any updated SAE data to the sponsor within 24 hours of it being available.” [Emphasis added.] [p. 74]
- Additionally, Section 8.3.1.2. “All nonserious AEs and SAEs occurring in a participant during the active collection period, which begins after obtaining informed consent as described in Section 8.3.1, will be recorded on the AE section of the CRF. The investigator is to record on the CRF all directly observed and all spontaneously reported AEs and SAEs reported by the participant.” [Emphasis added.] [p. 74]
This graphic below shows the accurate and available serious adverse events data which should have been presented at the December 10, 2020, EUA Authorization Request meeting:
It shows an equal chance of death in vaccine and placebo arms of the trial and, thus, no benefit from Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine. Moreover, it also clearly shows Pfizer knew and, therefore, the FDA should have known that there were twice as many cardiovascular adverse events in the vaccinated arm of the clinical trial versus the placebo arm.
The charts below show the delays in recording deaths in the vaccinated (“BNT”) arm trial subjects. The chart on the left is based on CRF data, which is the data that was used to request EUA approval. The chart on the right shows marked improvement in the speed of reporting deaths when the newly discovered date in the report narrative, outlined above, is included.
The NEJM article mentioned in the chart is available at https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMc2036242.
Had the death data that was available to Pfizer before November 14, 2020, and which showed no positive impact on death outcomes, been presented at the December 10, 2020, Vaccines and Related Biologics Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) Meeting for Pfizer’s COVID vaccine emergency use authorization request, it would have been very difficult, if not impossible, for the VRBPAC members to vote to authorize Pfizer’s EUA. Instead, Pfizer seemingly buried two “inconvenient” deaths from the vaccinated arm until after the data cutoff date, thus inaccurately showing twice as many deaths in the placebo arm of its trial on December 10, 2020. On December 11, 2020, the FDA granted the EUA for Pfizer’s vaccine based on inaccurate data, and that data-related negligence has negatively impacted the health of countless people worldwide.
###
Dr. Kunadhasan will be presenting about this finding, as well as on the Forensic Analysis of the 38 Subject Deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial preprint, both in the Australian Parliament in Canberra, Australia, and at the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society’s “Inquiry into Australia’s Excess Mortality” in Kambah, Australia, on October 18, 2023. Please read more about the inquiry here. Tickets are available for the public event here. Additionally, the results of the inquiry will be published as a book, and book-related information is available here.
Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!
You need to review Table 2 in Michels et al. (https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v3i1.85). Based on dates of subject deaths in the 6-Month Interim Report, by November 14 there were 6 Vaccine deaths and 5 placebo deaths for a total of 11 deaths. BUT the EUA reports only 6 deaths, 2 Vaccine and 4 placebo.
Pfizer used an elaborate procedure for documenting a death. This procedure is not explained anywhere in the available documentation. From what we surmise, when a death was reported to Pfizer it was confirmed by their medical team, recorded in something called a “Death Details” form, and possibly other checks were needed. When this process was complete, the subject’s date of death was recorded in the subjects “Case Report Form”. The protocol demanded that the trial site notify Pfizer of the subject’s death IMMEDIATELY but definitely within 24 hours. There were no time requirements regarding the process for recording the date of death. There in is the rub and the source of confusion.
Pfizer manipulated the time the process took to RECORD the date of death in the CRF. Moreover, when they reported the date of death in the EUA, they reported the date that the death was RECORDED IN THE CRF not the actual date the subject died. In Figure 3 of Michels et al, you will see that this delay in the date was 3-5 days for the placebo subjects BUT up to 36 days for the Vaccinated subjects. Thus, by slow walking record keeping, Pfizer manipulated the results reported in the EUA. This was critical for 4 of the Vaccinated subjects and 1 placebo because the actual dates of death were not in the EUA. In 2 of these 4 Vaccinated subjects, we have hard evidence that the trial site met the requirement of reporting within the 24 hour window. This means that, in these 2 cases, Pfizer’s death date recording process artificially suppressed the subjects’ true date of death.
Had these 2 cases, for which we have hard evidence, been included in the EUA, the number of subject deaths would have been 4 Vaccinated vs 4 placebo AND the causes of death 4 cardiac events in Vaccinated vs 2 cardiac events + 2 other causes in the placebo.
I hope this clarifies.
I didn’t know about that article, thanks a lot!
No wonder they wouldn’t release the raw data like Peter Doshi, over at BMJ, wanted in Jan 2021.
My position has always been I will NEVER give up my right to informed consent. They are not taking it away from me by hiding data. I flatly REFUSE under any circumstances to agree or go along.