“170 Patients That Changed Everything” – Spectator | Australia
Few people realise that the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine/BNT162b2 was granted on the efficacy data of 170 patients. The 162 who received a placebo and 8 patients who were vaccinated formed the basis of the 95 per cent efficacy claims.
There has not been much discussion of these patients. Where did they come from? Can we get an approximate timeline as when these patients would have been collected?
The endpoint of the Pfizer-BioNTech trial(1)Â was getting a Covid infection at least 7 days after dose 2, and vaccine efficacy was measured by calculating the risk of disease among vaccinated and unvaccinated persons and determining the percentage reduction in risk of disease among vaccinated persons relative to unvaccinated persons.(2)
The 170 patients were found, buried deep amongst the hundreds of thousands of pages, made available only via court order.
In a paper(3) published on dailyclout.io, my co-authors and I go into the detail of how they were found. We also cross-referenced our list with publicly available demographic data yielding a perfect match. As such, we are confident that our list of the 170 patients, publicly available in our article as an excel spreadsheet, are in fact the 170 that were the basis of the ‘effective’ claim in the ‘safe and effective’ mantra.
According to the trial protocol, a major protocol deviation in the evaluable efficacy population would exclude a participant from the final analysis. This makes sense, if you are going to declare a drug effective, you would want to do it based on a population that had gone through your trial protocol properly and had none of the disqualifying events that had been laid out in your protocol.
What did we find in the 170 patient population?
Lead investigator on this with an Australian doctor Fired for not getting the vaccine. He notes that Out of the 170 patience, looks like almost everybody was in the placebo group for some reason. That’s shady to start off with.. But even going by their own data with multiple protocol violations it appears that ,by their methods the vaccine was noted to be efficacious “the last week of October 2020“. He was wondering why it wasn’t announced at that time was no interim analysis done? Because the final result wasn’t out until mid November.. The author might not have noticed being Australian but me,
Being an American following politics politics it was obvious to me even at the time that The bad guys did not want to release the positive study before the election. Because it came out immediately after the election. Trump had said he was going to have a vaccine by the end of the year and he did. Given that the country had the condition to believe there was nothing to do for the virus it was killing everyone except wait for the vaccine, what do you think would’ve happened if the FDA and Pfizer announced that they had a working vaccine November 1? I think there would’ve been a flood in the polls in favor of Donald Trump..
Given that the virus was probably released as a Bioweapon for multiple reasons, one of the main one being to get rid of Donald Trump, as the main threat to the deep state globalist world take over, which has proceeded a pace since,. they sure weren’t going to hand him a win by saying the vaccine was ready to go the week before the election..
Assholes!