Why Was Pfizer Experimenting With Our Children?
The COVID vaccine trial was meant for Adults only, yet during the trial, and even after the start of the roll-out, children and infants were being given the adult unapproved dose of the vaccine.
If you thought that severe adverse events were worse than expected from a ‘vaccine’ that was supposed to be ‘safe and effective’, protecting us from the rapidly mutating Wuhan virus, how much worse is it to discover that children and infants received the shot before it had been tested in their age group.
Bear in mind that children rarely catch COVID and even more rarely do they die from it, usually shrugging the illness off, just like a common cold.
And yet, a vaccine was given to 34 children in the first 90 days of the roll-out of the shots, producing a total of 134 recorded adverse events. This was revealed through the Pfizer Post Marketing Experience 5.3.6 document, made available along with 55,000 others thanks to the work of Del Bigtree and ICAN, through the law-fare of Aaron Siri.
Thanks to the release of these documents, which slowly dropped over the last 11 months, we can now see what was available to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and their vaccine committees: the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) and the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), that they tried to remain sealed for 75 years.
The evidence for their crimes has been mounting as many groups have been analyzing the documents, writing reports, and producing lawsuits including, but not limited to, the Children’s Health Defence, Highwire, and Steve Kirsch’s Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VRSF).
Among these groups is the War Room/Daily Clout Pfizer Document Analysis teams, to which I belong, brought together by Dr. Naomi Wolf after a call for volunteers on Steve Bannon’s War Room show. There are more than 3500 volunteers, comprising approximately 3,250 physicians, academics, nurses, clinical trials specialists, pharmacists, and forensic accountants, sifting through each document as they are released.
We are already well over 50 reports made as a part of this research and was recently released as Vol 1 of a report of our work.
Several of the early documents had proven to be a treasure trove of evidence that the FDA did not want to be exposed to the public, which is why they tried to keep it sealed for 75 years so that those responsible for these crimes would be dead and gone by the time they were released, and that no one would care anymore, as this was ‘ancient history’. None of that narrative deterred us from looking at the data, and what we found shocked us……..
It was a surprise to us when we found that some children received the first trial vaccine in the phase 1 safety trials, run by BioNTech in Germany and China.
Children were not only prohibited from the original clinical trial, amongst other classes of individuals which included pregnant women but given different vaccine candidates at high doses, which started at 100 micrograms (MCG) and eventually stabilized at 30 mcg for adults. Subsequently, when the under-12 children’s vaccine was formally approved, it was at a significantly smaller dose of 10 mcg. Eventually, the advisory committees would approve a 3 mcg dose for infants for the under 5 age group.
The Phase 1 trials are supposed to be SAFETY orientated, related to ‘reactogenicity’ and toxicity of the vaccine ‘candidate’ of which there were many
On receiving the 5.3.6. document, we began to see many children scattered within the 9-page appendix of Severe Adverse Events (SAE). We speculate that by scattering them through the various reports of organ-based reporting, they thought that we would not notice them, but once we started finding children, we could not stop seeing them and we started to pull them from out of the darkness.
This report, co-authored with the Drs Gehrett and Loree Brit details the number of children who received the vaccine and the proportion that suffered from SAEs.
This age group of children is at extremely low risk of suffering serious consequences from the infection, especially since Omicron reduced the pathogenicity of COVID. Therefore, making an intervention of this magnitude, compounded with being mandatory, make any serious adverse events a major consequence, and weigh strongly against taking the vaccine in the cost vs benefit equation. We need to prevent causing unnecessary harm to these children by recognizing the seriousness of these adverse events and pulling the shots from public use.
A document in the British Medical Journal Evidence-based medicine toolkit examines this balance in detail
Risk vs Benefit is key in Modern Medicine
When were children under 12 authorized to receive the vaccine?
This group is split into 6 months to 4 yrs 11 months, and 5 yrs to 11 yrs 11 months.
A summary of the clinical trials that led to the EUA is shown below (data compiled by Erika Delph (AKA the ‘Angry Pharmacist’)
5 – 11 years
The FDA issued EUA on May 10, 2021 (CDC approved May 12, 2021)
6 months – 4 years
The FDA issued EUA on June 15, 2022 (CDC approved June 18, 2022)
In view of this and the dates that the FDA stated it was ‘Safe and Effective’ to authorize a EUA for both age ranges, it emphasizes the issue of illegitimate use of an unapproved product in an unauthorized age group(s).
No serious adverse events should be tolerated when the alleged advantage of protection for a small number of patients is so small.
In the short time span of the Post Marketing Experience report of 90 days, with large numbers of vaccines being administered throughout the UK followed by the USA, we found 34 children who were seriously harmed. Most of these children were in the UK, where the vaccine was first rolled out and a few were within the USA.
What we must not lose sight of is that these children were injured by giving an unauthorized vaccine and at the current adult dose. The persons responsible should be held to account individually. In reality, this is never going to happen. I understand that the fear of COVID infection drove people to their limits, and mothers were clamoring to have their children and babies vaccinated.
But who, in their right mind, would actually administer these products when they were unauthorized?
Did the vaccinators fear no consequence would arise from their actions?
What, if anything, can we do or legislate to prevent this from happening in the future?
Can we really trust the regulators to regulate themselves, or do we need a NEW body built to protect ‘We The People’?
Comments below, please.
We need to come up with constructive solutions, while Congress continues its investigations.
This article has been republished from the author’s Substack.
One of our country’s most important freedoms is that of free speech.
Agree with this essay? Disagree? Join the debate by writing to DailyClout HERE.