Fighting University Vaccine Mandates – Legal Strategies
Thursday, March 10th, 2022, DailyClout held a live webinar, featuring Attorney Warner Mendenhall, covering the on-going vaccine mandates at prominent Universities. Mr. Mendenhall discussed legal options for students and parents affected by these mandates. Below is the recorded webinar.
Leading Civil Rights Attorney & Former Akron OH City Councilman, Warner Mendenhall discusses:
- Overview of Cases at Stanford and Ohio State.
- What is the law and which are the Universities violating it?
- Discussion with affected students.
- Overview of rights according to Federal law, state law, etc.
- Discussion of religious exemptions and other strategies.
My grandson left Mount Saint Joseph University , a CATHOLIC university in Ohio, because they twice denied his religious exemption. It’s so disgusting!
We have been searching for a governmental entity to declare the contents of the COVID vials to be dangerous. A UK police department had a lab complete a forensic analysis to determine the ingredients in the COVID vials. They found graphene oxide and graphene nano particles (GFN) in them. We are not attorneys so we would like to know your thoughts on if this information with a request for criminal investigation be an effective tool to stop CVD vax mandates?
lease feel free to use this information on future CVD injection mandate legislation. I asked the legislators involved with AB 1993 to contact the UK Police but I didn’t have the contact information for them until today. , Contact information for the UK Police:
Hammersmith Police Station
226 Shepards Bush Road
Hammersmiith
London W6 7NX
General telephone number: 020 8563 1212
Metropolitan Police crime number – 6029679/21
Hammersmith Police Station
Officers allocated: DS Mallet and PC Irvine
Harvey Makishima, CEO
Public Awareness for Preventive Health Care
PAPHC. Inc.
Member, People’s Court of Public Opinion
_____________________________________________
I sent the UK police information to the six legislators who were to meet in committee on this “No Jab – No Job” bill.
From: Harvey Makishima
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 11:43 PM
To: ‘assemblymember.kalra@assembly.ca.gov’ ; ‘assemblymember.flora@assembly.ca.gov’ ; ‘assemblymember.jones-sawyer@assembly.ca.gov’ ; ‘assemblymember.reyes@assembly.ca.gov’ ; ‘assemblymember.seyarto@assembly.ca.gov’ ; ‘assemblymember.ward@assembly.ca.gov’
Subject: Graphene Component: Official U.K. Lab Report Confirms Covid Vaccines definitely Contain Graphene Oxide
We received notification of several bills which involved the mandate of the C*V*D Jab and since we are working with our Board of Supervisors I thought I would share the following with all of you to send to legislators who wish to support mandates of the C*V*D injections.
Dear Assemblymembers: We wanted to notify you about a recent report involving the ingredients in the COVID-19 vials. During the past two years we have been trying to determine the actual ingredients in these vials with limited success. We have received reports and videos from private sector doctors and scientists showing what is in the vials. However, since we have worked in county and state governments during our careers we believe that those who have worked in the public sector health departments know that they have the authority and responsibility for matters involving public health and safety. For this reason our organization could not fully accept what the private sector had sent us.
However, with the report below we now have a United Kingdom (UK) governmental medical organization and a London police department which show that the COVID vials are highly toxic, dangerous and should not be injected into anyone. We note that there is a criminal case number assigned to the matter in the UK. Since we are not attorneys does this mean that when dangerous ingredients are found in COVID vials that an injection mandate of them then makes it a criminal matter?
We highly recommend that your staff contact both of these UK organizations to confirm and authenticate their findings. Your staff can refer to UK Criminal Case, 6029679/21 to find the appropriate contacts involved. Please let us know the results of your investigation at the UK.
Thank you for your cooperation in this important public health matter.
Harve
Harvey Makishima, CEO
Public Awareness for Preventive Healthcare
PAPHC, Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Date: February 14, 2022 Author: lance goodall 0 Comments
BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON FEBRUARY 13, 2022 • ( 16 COMMENTS )
The Covid-19 vaccines have been forensically examined in the United Kingdom and a laboratory report confirms they contain graphene nanomaterials that can penetrate the body’s natural barriers and damage the central nervous system, and Graphene Oxide which can damage internal organs, destroy blood health, trigger cancer, and cause changes in gene function among a host of other ill effects.
Further vials have since been obtained which cover the three main manufacturers in the UK: Pfizer,
Moderna and AstraZeneca.
The contents of the injection vials have been forensically examined and a laboratory report has now been officially published.
The report titled “Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions In Moderna, AstraZeneca and Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines” has been presented to the Police involved in the UK Criminal Case, 6029679/21, which is said to provide them with more than enough reasonable suspicion that serious indictable offences have been committed regarding the administration of experimental treatments.
The report contains the toxicology reports of injection vials that have been forensically examined, with findings that provide “more than enough grounds” for the Police to apply for the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 Warrant and seize injection vials for themselves.
The Police will then be able to submit them to a Home Office Laboratory with a view to replicate the findings and will enable them to possess their own hard evidence to support serious indictable offences.
Additionally, the police, in line with the duty of care to the public, have been asked to request the immediate cessation of the experimental treatment rollout.
The Report: Qualitative Evaluation of Inclusions In Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer Covid-19 vaccines – by UNIT
Four vaccine vials were the subject of the investigation.
Two Moderna samples, and 1 AstraZeneca, and 1 Pfizer sample were collected for examination in order to analyse the contents and identify if undeclared components were present in them.
Here is the list of declared ingredients in each vaccine by the manufacturers –
The inclusions that are not declared by the manufacturers were the focus for this particular analysis, primarily graphene and carbon-related nanostructures in form of carbon or graphene composites, graphene in association with polyethylene glycol, graphene oxide, iron oxide compounds, and calcite.
The Four Vials
The analysis of all four vial contents identified objects that are similar and have been defined and illustrated within the report individually.
The Identified inclusions were:
1. Graphene nano ribbons coated with Polyethylene Glycol
2. Graphene Composite Form 1.
3. Graphene Composite Form 2.
4. Microcrystalline Calcite with Carbonaceous inclusions.
5. Graphene Nano Form with and without fluorescence
6. Graphene nano objects
7. Graphene nano scrolls
Moderna 01
The first sample that was evaluated was the Moderna 01 which was examined by Raman spectroscopy. The investigation clearly showed that all the inclusions within the vaccine have a strong carbon signal with confirmed graphene compositions of some representative forms.
Two clear signals were obtained from two objects. The flat ribbon-like inclusions exhibited clear graphene spectra integrated with the spectrum of glycol and other minor compounds. The other clear signal was obtained from a calcite microcrystalline form and Carbon composite forms also had a clear graphene signal.
It is important to point out that some nano amorphous carbon forms showed a clear Graphene signal, however, these forms also exhibited fluorescence which masked the Graphene peak.
Moderna 02
Particles that carry the mRNA load were clearly seen and Graphene composite 01 was prominently present even at low resolution and Graphene Nano objects were present in “great abundance.” within the vial sample.
AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca was the third vaccine that was evaluated for its inclusion, and as it was almost transparent it made “spotting of inherent colours slightly easier”. Under wet microscopic observation, the solution exhibited instantaneous movement of nanoscopic particulate material which when observed closely seemed to be driven by convection current.
When dry, the particles exhibited traction movement. In figure, 3.21. the microscopic form is clearly visible as it is lying on top of the solid film while the nanoparticles are still in motion in the background as can be seen by the shifting position of the shadow. A clear output of this mechanism was that as the medium solidified, it became more difficult for the nanoparticles to navigate through the viscous material.
Confirmed inclusions within AstraZeneca were of the presence of Graphene in all the identified representative forms. The carbon composites are of two forms as they are in the Moderna vaccines. These two forms showed distinct graphene signatures. Also, besides Graphene the spectrum is dominated by iron oxide and other forms of carbon associations.
Pfizer
Pfizer was the fourth vaccine vial that was evaluated for its inclusions. The pipette specimen showed some extremely interesting inclusions. As the material was sucked into the pipette, distinct translucent to transparent sheets were seen floating about as seen in figure 3.28.
Three of these samples showed carbon composite signatures with possible graphene in. The signals of amorphous carbon-like materials were extremely complex with carbon along with iron oxide and several other compounds in them.
Ribbon forms of nearly transparent microforms are found in fair numbers in the slide. These are often half embedded in the solution with one end projecting outside the material. The carbon composites of both form 1 and 2 also are present in great numbers. Form 1 settles on top of the material while form 2 is found at mid-levels of the solidified medium. Graphene nanoforms are present in fair numbers within the slide material along with some scrolls. Figure 3.32. Representative inclusions found within Pfizer vaccine.
The signals of amorphous carbon-like materials were extremely complex with carbon along with iron oxide and several other compounds in them. The graphene complex 1 is graphene with polyethylene glycol signal forming the bulk of the spectrum. Though, for initial assessments, this study can confirm the presence of graphene in Pfizer.
Notably, one of the samples that was shot, displayed a fair influence of fluorescence.
To Conclude
All three vaccines commonly employ the self-assembling lipid nanoparticles as drug delivery mechanisms. Where the central find of this project has been the confirmation of the presence of graphene in all four samples, it is important to evaluate this find in the context of the subject itself.
It is also important to mention, that the source of fluorescence within the samples was unknown while the investigations were underway, and due to tight timescales were not able to be investigated at the time.
Source
An Open Access review highlighting the toxicity of the graphene family nanoparticles can be viewed here.
In conclusion, it can be stated that the four samples of vaccines (Moderna 1, Modern 2, AstraZeneca, Pfizer) all contain significant amount of carbon composites, graphene compounds, and iron oxide.
These ingredients were undeclared by the manufacturers and are absent from the list of ingredients for the vaccines. However, studies show how dangerous the Graphene family is, yet individuals have not been made aware that they are being injected with the deadly substance.