The Psychology of the COVID Crimes
Dr. Naomi Wolf interviews Dr. Peter Breggin to discuss the psychology of the COVID crimes.
Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!
Dr. Naomi Wolf interviews Dr. Peter Breggin to discuss the psychology of the COVID crimes.
Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I agree with Sara Carter. I haven’t finished reading Desmit’s book yet and have not read Dr Breggin’s book, however, on what he presented in this interview was rather lacking in terms of consistency in message, on the broad range of topics discussed.
Thank you for this conversation. It covers a lot of things that I’ve been grappling with. Especially this notion of ordinary people who were divisive throughout this ordeal, never having to do any self-reflection, never having to take stock of how much poison they spewed, and how many lies they believed without question. I’m grappling with my anger toward these people. I don’t like being so resentful, but I am because most have learned nothing, and it seems they won’t know until tragedy strikes them personally. It didn’t take that for me to see the truth. I felt it in my bones from the very start. So I sought out credentialed, opposing points of view. I compared and contrasted. And this process validated my intuition. I often ask my friends, “how can you know what to think about an important, complicated subject when you’ve only ever bothered to hear one point of view?” They will give me glazed eyes and vibes that show a palpable urge to change the subject. They may say, “We’ll have to agree to disagree,” even while they haven’t made a case for why they disagree. It’s truly disturbing because these people are set to get sucked into the next big psyop. This is why I believe it is EXTREMELY important that the perpetrators be brought to justice. So that ordinary covidians can come face to face with the disaster their blind compliance enabled.
I really wish I could edit this comment. On second read it doesn’t exactly say what I intended the way I had in tended. But, oh well. Let that be a lesson to me.
In the 12 step program I think it is step number 5 Take a fearless and searching moral inventory. The next step is about making amends. Apologize Admit your behavior harmed others. People need to painfully and couragously confront themselves. a good long look in the mirror and deep remorse. Someone who does this is not looking for amnesty. They spend the rest of their lives making up for what they did by becoming a person of extraordinary integrity..
Did he say he used critical thinking to prove there is no God? Or something along those lines?
She might be right but, the system is not willing to investigate these crimes.