Prior to the COVID vaccines, the average miscarriage rate in 2001 was 10% to 15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies, according to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. [6]

Data in the U.K., as reported to the UK’s Yellow Card system showed a similar rate of 90% miscarriages following the Pfizer vaccine, as I calculated from data that had been reported on a U.K. government page that has now been removed. [7] Internet archives still show the original document that records the U.K. government knew about the high miscarriage rate as of the date of publication, April 21, 2021. [8] It showed for the Pfizer vaccine results, 2 fetal deaths + 10 stillbirths + 489 abortions + 15 ectopic pregnancies. As for the healthy outcomes, the U.K. data reported 2 normal newborns + 2 normal term births + 35 normal pregnancies + 8 normal live births. So the unhealthy outcomes totaled 516, and the healthy outcomes totaled 47. Dividing 516 / 47 = 10.97. So unhealthy outcomes divided by healthy outcomes resulted in a greater than ten-fold factor of risk for dead fetus over a live fetus/baby.

It should be noted that the U.K. data may be skewed toward over-reporting of adverse events, due to possible reliance on the Yellow Card System data. Or on the other hand, the data can be skewed toward under-reporting, as has been seen in the US VAERS system. However, because the statistics are so similar to Pfizer data in the U.S., there is likely confirmation.

I had warned about this risk to fertility way back in February 2021, before the peak uptake of COVID vaccines in either the U.S. or in the U.K. [9]

After more data became available, Dr, Pierre Kory’s later, more accurate, estimate of miscarriage risk was 87.5%. [10] I discuss this more at https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/toxic-masculinity-is-not-as-advertised

Miscarriage is often termed by its clinical name “spontaneous abortion.” [11]

I also showed that the Moderna-vaccinated and Astra Zeneca-vaccinated pregnant women in the U.K. had similar pregnancy outcomes, with approximately a nine-to-one and ten-to-one risk of fetal death. And this was known by May 4, 2022. [12]

Birth data from Europe

By August 2022, the Hagemann research team had gathered births data in 19 European countries and found a consistent pattern. In all of the countries, reduced births consistently began at the end of the year 2021. This was nine months after peak COVID vaccine uptake throughout Europe. [13] I discuss this phenomenon and Hagemann’s findings here: https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/birth-rates-plunge-in-heavily-vaccinated

Obstetrician/gynecologist James Thorp MD has practiced obstetrics since 1980, and specializes in high-risk pregnancies. In 2022 he observed: “What I’ve seen in the last two years is unprecedented: many, many, many complications due to the COVD vaccines, in pregnant women, in moms and in fetuses, in children . . . fetal death, miscarriage . . . unprecedented.” [14]

Dr. Thorp discuss this further in an interview with Tucker Carlson, regarding “a1200-fold increase in menstrual abnormalities and a 57-fold increase in miscarriages.” [15]

Aso in 2022, another obstetrician/gynecologist, Kimberly Biss MD, discussed a 50% decline in fertility and a 50% increase in miscarriages in her group practice, since the COVID vaccine uptake. [16]

This was not the first vaccine for which pregnancy and fetuses had met tragic outcomes. The World Health Organization had long taken an interest in “anti-fertility vaccines” and “fertility regulating vaccines,” at least since 1992. “Chorionic gonadotropin is the one antigen that fulfills criteria for an ideal contraceptive vaccine.” [Emphasis added] [17] The WHO also confesses that “Studies in primates have shown that immunization with anti-hCG vaccines will render the animals infertile without any detectable alteration to their menstrual cycles.” And that “the same vaccines are envisaged to be used to regulate male fertility.” [18] Those vaccines worked very effectively for the stated purpose. Of 80 vaccinated women enrolled in a trial, “only one pregnancy was reported in this group after an accumulated total of 900 woman-months of otherwise unprotected intercourse.” [19]

The WHO also admitted that there were “informed consent forms used in clinical trials which often imply that there are no problems or side-effects associated with use of the method.” And that such practice was “unethical.” [20] What was also unethical was that the WHO did not inform the general public in the countries where people were inflicted with these vaccines about infertility risks.

It seems that the COVID vaccines are having a similar unannounced effect against fertility.

What did the vaccine companies know and when about injuries to babies and fetuses from the COVID vaccines?

Naomi Wolf’s book The Pfizer Papers shows the locations in Pfizer’s own documents to the FDA where Pfizer was aware of the following hazard signals post-vaccine doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech product BNT 162b2, also marketed as the “Comirnaty” COVID vaccine. These were observed in the Pfizer trials. By early 2021, Pfizer knew of, and the FDA received reporting of:

– Injuries to fetuses and babies; [21]

– 48 different categories of adverse events to breastfed babies; [22] Also, the COVID vaccine had been found in breast milk. [23] The authors of that finding wrote: “Of 11 lactating individuals enrolled, trace amounts of BNT 162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were detected in 7 samples from 5 different participants at various times up to 45 hours post-vaccination.” Their average finding in human breast milk was 5.0¹⁰ to 9.1¹⁰ particles/mL, which is the equivalent of billions of particles per quarter teaspoon.

– 28 deaths of fetuses or neonates. However, for 88% of the pregnancies in the Pfizer trials, there was “no outcome reported.” [24] This gaping lack of reporting of the pregnancy outcomes of the women in the vaccine trial has not yet been explained by Pfizer.

As for Moderna, there were also hazard signals and damage to pregnancies that the company failed to report to the public. In Moderna’s animal study, there were 22% fewer natural birth in COVID-vaccinated rats. [25]

Menstruation and menstrual irregularities

Menstruation is considered to be a cycle of opposing processes – one that builds and proliferates the endometrial glands and stroma in the uterine lining, for two weeks after ovulation, alternating with and counterbalanced with a destructive process to that endometrial lining, which begins with drops in hormone levels particularly progesterone, decreased oxygen, death of cells in the endometrial lining, liquefying and shedding of those cells, known as menstruation. Keep the lining intact, and you can carry a baby through gestation to birth. Shed the lining and everything goes with it, including possibly a new human life. Nature describes menstruation as “a phenomenon of repeated tissue injury and repair that is a fine balance between proliferation, decidualization, inflammation, hypoxia, apoptosis, haemostasis, vasoconstriction and, finally, repair and regeneration.” [26] This is a lot of activity that is roughly sinusoidal and continually reversing, but that is a typical monthly cycle for the female reproductive system.

Excessive or frequent menstrual bleeding, termed menorrhagia and metrorrhagia respectively, were frequently reported disorders following dosing of COVID vaccines. Such abundant bleeding can lead to loss of iron, an iron-deficient anemia. The excess bleeding is more associated with the destruction of the uterine lining, the endometrium, along with most of its blood vessels. In this article, I discussed the degradation of the endothelial lining of blood vessels following COVID vaccine dosing, and that this can be so extensive as to destroy the vessel and leak blood into the surrounding tissue. https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/is-it-possible-to-avoid-heart-damage

Naomi Wolf, quoted at the beginning of this article, had started an online survey, early in the COVID vaccine season, spring of 2021. However, intense censorship on social media obliterated records of the data that she collected.

Then anthropologist Kathryn Clancy and colleagues launched an online survey of women over age 18, to which over 16,000 responses were received. Of those, 42% reported heavier menstrual bleeding after COVID vaccination. [27] That study grew to over 165,000 women, in which 42% of those with normal menstrual cycles had menstrual changes after vaccination. And even 66% of menopausal women had unexpected menstrual symptoms after vaccination. Even pro-vaccine media reported the findings. [28]

The CDC’s V-Safe system has free-text fields in which information can be submitted regarding adverse effects from vaccines. That database showed that 62,679 women had reported menstrual irregularities following vaccination. This was reported in The Lancet. [29]

The peer-reviewed literature has many times confirmed association between COVID vaccination and menstrual irregularities, regardless of the vaccine brand. [30] Another study of 14,153 women found that 78% experienced menstrual changes from vaccination. [31] A smaller study, published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology found similar proportions of affected women. 67% were more likely to have prolonged menstruation, and 41% were more likely for it to continue past 9 months. [32] A study in Japan found that menstrual bleeding was extended for 2.5 days on average following COVID vaccination. [33]

Non-menstruating women were found to have 2 to 5 times increased likelihood of bleeding following COVID vaccination. [34] Interestingly, Moderna was 32% more likely than Pfizer to have this effect. And it so happens that the Moderna vaccine dose is twice the strength of the Pfizer vaccine dose.

The reason such findings as in the above paragraphs are important is not only related to the discomfort of the woman affected, but also because menstrual bleeding empties the contents of the uterus, and sometimes that content includes a new human life. So therefore, the vaccines’ association with increased menstrual bleeding has an abortifacient effect on some women, at some times in their menstrual cycle. This is reflected in the enormous loss of pregnancies discussed at the beginning of this article.

The public should have been alerted to this possibility. Anyone who champions the right of women to make their own reproductive choices should have asked for such transparency. Families, particularly expectant parents, and aspiring parents, had the right to know.

COVID vaccine effects on the ovaries

The delivery vehicle of the COVID vaccines are the lipid nanoparticle envelopes (LNPs), which were found to arrive to the ovary in higher concentration than most other organs, and to accumulate there. [35] This was known to the FDA, Pfizer and the Acuitas company in November 2020, prior to distribution of the COVID vaccines to the public. [36]

Granulosa cells in the ovaries surround the “egg,” or human oocyte, and they are involved in hormone feedback loops with the pituitary and hypothalamus in the brain. These interactions are what regulate the menstrual cycle, the starting and stopping of monthly bleeding. The granulosa cells produce estrogen during the first phase, the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle, and later in the luteal phase, they produce progesterone. Granulosa cells also support and nourish the developing follicle. When those cells were subject to the COVID vaccine in vitro, their relative proportions of hormones doubled and tripled, specifically the FSH / Inhibin B ratio in all women tested. [37] Inhibin B is a key hormone in regulation of the menstrual cycles. [38] Such wild swings (2 to 3 times) in hormone proportions are enough to throw the normally well-coordinated interplay of female hormones into disarray, with predictable resulting disruptive effects on oocytes and on menstrual cycles.

Shedding

Much more has been written about shedding since the 2021 observations at my small clinic, that I wrote about here. https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/secondary-vaccine-effects Pfizer had subtly acknowledged shedding deep in its documentation to the FDA prior to release of the COVID vaccine, [39] but very few had noticed, and those of us who were thoroughly censored under Biden administration coercion, as I was from nearly all social media at that time, could not communicate this danger to large audiences.

A study in the spring of 2021 of 6,049 women over age 18 (mean age 38) included 3,390 who had never had any COVID vaccine. Of that group, 50.1% experienced menstrual abnormalities within three days after being exposed to a COVID vaccinated person, in less than a six-foot distance, and 71.7% had irregular menstrual symptoms within a week after that exposure. Of both cohorts of women, both directly vaccinated and secondarily exposed to vaccinated individuals, 92.3% self-reported menstrual irregularities. [40] 4.83% of the unvaccinated women even reported a decidual cast shedding, in which the entire lining of the uterus is discharged as one entire piece. Prior to the COVID vaccines, such an event was so rare that fewer than 40 such cases had ever been reported to the medical journals worldwide in 109 years. [41]

The most commonly reported symptoms in that study were heavier menstrual bleeding than usual, early menses and extended menstrual bleeding. If the spike protein had actually entered the body, and found its way to the reproductive tract of women who were merely in close proximity to the COVID vaccinated, then the ubiquity of spike penetration is quite impressive in its reach.

But the COVID vaccine is unlike other shedding vaccines. Polio and measles vaccines have been notoriously shedding, due to the presence of live virus in those vaccines permeating the bodies of the vaccinated, rendering them vectors of communicable disease. Even the politically and financially entangled CDC has acknowledged such transmission. [42] But the mRNA vaccines do not contain self-replicating coronaviruses, to either infect the self or others. It has been found that exosomes, which can be thought of as exit packages, do carry spike proteins for at least one year, [43] and they carry the ones that were specifically made by the Pfizer vaccines into the plasma. [44] From there, it is a short distance to the saliva and out of the body. However, no adequate explanation of vector transmission for these vaccines all the way to the uterus, seems to be available yet.

COVID vaccines’ effects on testicles and male fertility

Wolf’s The Pfizer Papers exposes extensive histopathology findings of the late pathologist Arne Burkhardt, findings that might have otherwise been lost to esoteric academic discussions among small groups. His slideshows are reproduced there verbatim and with full-color photography of his microscopic findings. At one point, Burkhardt says, “I think these pictures are very disturbing for me.” He had found on autopsy of a 28 year old man, who died 140 dies after Pfizer injection, with almost no spermatocytes, and “there is strong expression of spike protein in the spermatogonia.” He found the same in the autopsy of an older man: “Not one single spermatozoa,” and “a strong expression of spike in spermatogonia.” Also “lymphocytic infiltration in testes and prostate.” [45]

The Israeli sperm study was published six months after the Pfizer mRNA vaccine rollout in Israel. Sperm concentration, sperm motility and total motile count continued to go down about one month, then three months, and then about five months after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. [46] Within one month, the median decline of sperm was 12 million per ml and of 31 million motile spermatozoa. Their data is as follows: