Reported initially by investigative journalist Sonia Elijah on her substack after a FOIA enabled the first-ever safety report from the European Union (PSUR#1) to be released.

This 286-page document describes the initial 6 months of data across European countries. The contents are disturbing and some of the findings are even more stunning, given that we have spent the last year decoding the 90-day follow-up by Pfizer in their Post Marketing Experience document 5.3.6, and have developed a thick skin.

I would encourage everyone to read Sonia Elijah’s substack posting, as she goes into great detail about the reason for the document and the framework of what it is supposed to cover. However, I will concentrate on the findings that most strike me while reading through the contents.

The PSUR is a much larger review of data reported in Europe during the first six months of the rollout of Comirnaty, the commercially approved version of BNT162b2, which is not available in the USA. Not only does it cover many countries, but only studies the safety signals in patients receiving the Pfizer vaccine, and does not include a similar number who received either Moderna or AstraZeneca products.

Consistently, throughout the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer document investigations, when writing our system micro-reports, we have found adverse events in women to outnumber men by a factor of around three to one.

But this NEW report reveals even more disturbing patterns of findings that will take us right back to the original documents to see if the same things were present in the initial Pfizer document.

Who reports adverse events anyway?

As with any of these reports, we have to take into account issues of under-reporting of adverse events. When I had a severe adverse event within 24 hours of receiving a booster ‘clot shot’ which did not resolve for upwards of 3 weeks, I had never heard of VAERS (vaccine adverse events reporting system) and would not know how to use it anyway. Also, male chauvinism, wanting to appear strong (to myself) I was stoic in keeping myself to myself.

The VAERS system was supposed to make reporting adverse events easy, and with the addition of v-safe (a very superficial ‘pain or redness of the injection site’ questionnaire), incomplete data was obviously going to be collected.

As a product of The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Lazarus report (2010) stated that “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)”

Other models conservatively estimate a 25% under-reporting rate. In Europe and Australasia, they have different reporting systems, some are purely reliant on primary health care doctors submitting a ‘yellow card’, or similar report. Either way, these events are always underestimated.

The PSUR#1 report contains some eye-watering statistics, particularly due to the large population that was vaccinated in the EU during the first 6 months of the rollout.

There were –

1.17 million adverse events with 5,115 deaths

⅓ of all Adverse Events (AEs) were serious

The commonest age range for these was for working-age adults (31-50 years)

Nearly half of all deaths plus 86% of AEs were amongst healthy people, in other words, those with NO CO-MORDBIDITIES

Nearly half of the outcomes remained ‘unresolved’

23% did not recover

Women suffered AEs at a rate of 3:1 over men

What evidence is there that these adverse events and deaths affect working age groups?

Figure 3 Page 37

The RED bands represent patients who had co-morbidities (like heart disease or diabetes) and the GREEN bands represent healthy populations. You would always expect people with underlying conditions to succumb to illness easier than healthy folk, but here the light band is way higher than the dark band in the 31-50 year group.

People WITHOUT co-morbidities show up in a large proportion of the EU data –

Figure 8 Page 45

In this large group of previously healthy people, in the cases reported, they comprised

46% of deaths, (2331:2758)

Not recovered or resolved in 79%, (60618:16270)

Recovered but with sequelae (that means that there was a residual abnormality/symptom or sign) in 73%, (2366:912)

92% of the unknown outcomes (64485:5783)

Why is there a preponderance of effects on women?

Figure 9 Page 42

It does not seem to matter whether you have co-morbidities, especially if you were healthy BEFORE the shots as if you are a woman you have a marked increased risk of suffering a long-term outcome, by this data.

Who leads the World tables in medication errors? 🇺🇸

Table 13 Page 67

Who would have thought it? The leading nation of the FREE WORLD with the most expensive healthcare is the good ol’ US of A.

Here are some of the types of errors, some of which were deemed fatal, that are described on page 68.

All of these errors should not take place in a controlled environment like a clinic administering vaccines. Good Distribution Practice is also mandatory in the European Union and Pfizer tried to circumvent the laws when they drew up contracts with the EU (see my report on Daily Clout)

©chrisflowersmd – navigating rough waters

CONCLUSIONS

In a very large data set from the European Union covering the first 6 months of the rollout of the Pfizer vaccine in European countries, serious adverse events and deaths with a preponderance of effects on working-age women were confirmed, similar to that already reported in the Pfizer documents by the Daily Clout/WarRoom volunteers

-End-

Subscribe to Dr. Chris Flowers’ Substack Page

Please Help the DailyClout / War Room Volunteers Blow the Biggest Story of Our Lifetime Wide Open

The information that Pfizer and the FDA wanted to keep hidden for 75 years has been thoroughly documented and compiled into an ebook – and made available on Amazon.

We are shattering expectations, but we need your continued support to push truth up the algorithm, which is not just good for the book and the project but also for the conversation, forcing the criminals to be confronted. We already have the blueprint for prosecution; we just need enough people informed to demand accountability:

Pick Up Your Copy!

Also available on our website.