Report 29: Did Pfizer and the FDA Conceal An Existing Remedy for COVID?

Did Pfizer Know Prevnar Prevented COVID?

Summary:

Research has shown that Pfizer may have known its pneumococcal drug Prevnar (PCV13) may have helped prevent COVID or SARS-COV-2 and that thus there was not a need for ‘Operation Warp Speed’ by the Trump Administration. Prevnar is an already-approved drug currently used to treat pneumonia. However, it has been shown to have general anti-viral effects and can thus be effective in protecting against bacterial respiratory infections. Despite Prevnar being a Pfizer drug, Pfizer did not present Prevnar to the public as an option for fighting against SARS-COV-2. Additionally, the new vaccines would fall under Emergency Use Authorization, which would ensure protection from liability for Pfizer. Not only did Pfizer fail to present Prevnar to Americans as a preventative option against COVID to the public, but the FDA also failed to reveal effective uses to the public. Instead, both Pfizer and the FDA moved forward with the release of the mRNA vaccines.

Article:

Did Pfizer and the FDA know that Prevnar (PCV13) prevented SARS-COV-2? Research reveals that they did.

Pfizer’s internal documents, released under court order, show that in Pfizer’s phased trials for their BioNTech mRNA vaccine, the company excluded any participant from the trials who was taking medications intended to prevent COVID-19. The interesting thing about this exclusion is that Pfizer knew that their pneumococcal drug Prevnar may prevent COVID (SARS-COV-2) in older patients aged 65 or older. In other words, Pfizer excluded participants who were already being helped by therapeutics. Once again, in Pfizer’s science, we see scientists excluding what they do not wish to find.

This screenshot from our first tranche of Pfizer documents. I have included page 29:

How do we know that Prevnar may prevent COVID? Prior research points to the protective effects of Prevnar (PCV13) in viral and ‘bacterial respiratory diseases.’ In a retrospective study published in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, PCV13 also showed protective effects against SARS-COV-2 infections.

Among 531, 033 adults, there were 3677 COVID-19 diagnoses, leading to 1075 hospitalizations and 334 fatalities between March 1st and July 22nd 2020.

[https://academic.oup.com/jid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/infdis/jiab128/6164926]

[https://www.infectiousdiseaseadvisor.com/home/topics/covid19/pneumococcal-conjugate-vaccine-pcv13-protective-against-sars-cov-2-infections/ ]

Why didn’t the FDA make this revelation available to the public? Notice that this discovery was from March – July of 2020 — in other words, “the height of the pandemic” — and yet the public was never formally informed about this protective drug. 

If the FDA had informed America about Prevnar in 2020, there would have been no need for the fast track status that the FDA gave to drug companies to develop the mRNA vaccines for COVID. That silence could have cost lives. 

[STN-125742_0_0-section-2.7.4-summary-clin-safety (listed on dailyclout.io under Campaigns/Pfizer documents]

[https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/STN-125742_0_0-Section-2.7.4-summary-clin-safety.pdf]

H.R. 5546 – The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 – established a vaccine injury schedule for pain and suffering with a maximum payment of $250,000 per incident, otherwise absolving drug companies of liability.

The Act provides that no vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death: (1) resulting from unavoidable side effects; or (2) solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings. It also ensures that a manufacturer may be held liable where: (1) such manufacturer engaged in the fraudulent or intentional withholding of information; or (2) such manufacturer failed to exercise due care. Lastly, it permits punitive damages under certain circumstances.

Did Pfizer engage in fraudulent or intentional withholding of information and fail to exercise “due care”? A court may well rule “yes.”

We now know from the Pfizer’s Internal Phase 1 trials of the COVID vaccine, the company identified “receipt of medications intended to prevent COVID-19.”

The above evidence may well prove that Pfizer knew that medications such as Prevnar could indeed prevent COVID-19 and this knowledge should have been revealed to the world before thousands died. What did Pfizer and the FDA know and when did they know it?

This Report was written exclusively for DailyClout by the Members of the War Room / DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers. 

It should not be copied or republished without permission from DailyClout or a full credit and link to DailyClout.io