COVlD l9 Hoax Goes to Court

Please read, share and act, your action can make a difference to the future of humanity!

On Friday, 5 Jan. 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) agreed to hear the case about whether Donald Trump is eligible for Colorado’s primary ballot. The same day, SCOTUS also began to discuss the merits of another, possibly much more important case: Dan Robert, et al. v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, et al. (Robert v. Austin), filed by a legal team led by Andrew L. Schlafly, Todd Callender, David Wilson and Lisa McGee.

Getting this case on the docket with the SCOTUS was in itself a major effort and a monumental achievement. If the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case, and it could be days or weeks before they reach that decision, it will be a watershed moment: the first time that the public health response to C0VlD l9 and its grave implications will be challenged in court.

Getting a court hearing matters hugely because this is how we establish incontrovertible truths and set them on record. As Todd Callender put it, courts are the finders of facts: “We are refining the facts; we are refining the questions of law, questions of philosophy, society, God, and we are arriving at our baseline: what is acceptable and what is not acceptable.”

Ultimately, truth is the bedrock of liberty and deception is how liberty is taken from us. Indeed, it is no exaggeration to say that this case should be an epic fact-finding clash between good and evil – the clash in which you too can join the trenches of the freedom fighters.

Continue Reading