Supreme Court Filing in The Arizona Voting Computer Malfunction Case

Maricopa County violated Arizona law by not conducting required tests of the voting computers. In addition, they used altered and hence, uncertified software that had major security flaws. As sworn by the Appellants and In my opinion and based on the declarations by three cyber experts, AZSOS, Maricopa, and Pima lied to the Court about each failure and those lies were fundamental to Courts’ decisioning. Those flawed decisions must be corrected by a remand order by SCOTUS.

Six days ago, Maricopa, AZSOS and Pima arrogantly waived any response to this shocking new evidence. In doing so, they triggered other violations of Arizona court rules and SCOTUS rules.

Respondents’ duty of candor to the Court converts their waiver of opposition briefs into affirmative statements that, under law, now require responses by AZSOS, Maricopa, and Pima. The duty to correct binds Maricopa, AZSOS, and Pima to respond under SCOTUS Rule 8.2 and under Arizona Rule 3.3(a)(1)

Burdened by their own likely misrepresentations to the courts, Maricopa, AZSOS, and Pima had and have a duty to correct and annot hide behind waivers or otherwise “duck” an issue and are subject to sanctions. If respondents previously knew their evidence was false, they committed a fraud on the court. If respondents learned of their evidence’s falsity from petitioners’ Motion to Expedite, respondents violated their duty of candor by waiving their briefs in opposition.