I am sure that you have seen the shocking documents detailing the Standards for European “Sexuality Education” already being implemented in 27 countries and the  International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education” (Both are attached for your convenience).

There is a significant difference between “Sex Education” and “Sexuality Education”. The former is fact-based.  The second is values-based, rationalized by stating that “Youth asked for this”  and includes pseudoscientific social and cultural positions upholding the explicit notions that “children must begin sexual activity as early as possible”, “children are capable from the earliest ages of consenting to sexual activity”, “early childhood masturbation should be taught (Ages 0-4)“, sexualization education should permeate all curricular areas and be integrated into every aspect of education, educators and educational institutions are far better judges than parents and other cultural institutions of what sexualization education should be offered, what values should be taught, what discussions are appropriate.

In short, by capturing this vital area of psychosocial and psychosexual development, the school replaces the parent, family, church, and community as the defining apparatus.

The value system embodied in these pervasive “norms” and “educational experiences” are designed, in my professional judgment, to carry out the explicit goal of the Gates-funded “scientifically based” Rutgers Foundation which believes that by altering fundamentally the sense of self and the nature of attachments, the, to them, the desirable goal of reducing deep relationship bonding and, hence, reducing the production of offspring can be achieved worldwide.

Sexuality Education is, according to WHO, UNESCO, and the UN, critical to a variety of the enslaving “sustainability goals” and should be meted out to every child on the planet by 2030, in keeping with the global Agenda 2030 “Sustainability Goals”.