“How to Fix Education”
Originally posted on the author’s Substack
What the ancients knew that we forgot…
The word education has meant a lot of different things over the centuries. You may think it comes from the Latin ēdūcere, “to lead out” — because the tutor of a wealthy Roman family would lead the children to school, or because he’d use the Socratic method of asking questions to “draw out” answers.
These are good stories, but they’re made up. Education comes from ēducāre — meaning “to raise, rear; to train.” So, the word “education” comes from the word “education”!
However, there was a distinct idea of what education meant in ancient Greece and Rome. It was training specifically in seven liberal arts: grammar, dialectic, rhetoric, arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy.
But more importantly, it was training to be human.
Let me explain what I mean — and what the ancients knew about education that we’ve long since forgotten…
Ancient Wisdom
Lots of things about the “seven liberal arts” might seem arbitrary. Why seven, and what’s “liberal” about them?
We’ll skip the details and jump to what they had in common in the ancients’ eyes. These subjects were “liberal” because they were the kind of thing studied by līberālēs, “free men.” Cicero, for instance, didn’t study music to know how to use it in a commercial, or dialectic because it would qualify him for tenure. He studied music and dialectic for the pleasure of understanding them.
Nowadays, we often hear that teaching this or that subject is a waste of time, because students “are never going to use it in the real world.” But, to the ancients, this would be the precise opposite of liberal.
A strictly practical education was for servī, “slaves.” They didn’t have time for the ancient equivalents of Pride and Prejudice or The Columbian Orator; they had work to do. As theoretical disciplines were liberal arts, practical disciplines were servile arts.
People might study arithmetic for the fun of it; nobody ever studied accounting for the fun of it. We only learn servile arts for the sake of something else.
The liberal arts, on the other hand — you were led to those by natural human curiosity. The first line of Aristotle’s Metaphysics, one of the greatest philosophical texts ever written, is “All men by nature desire knowledge.”
There is something in the human soul that craves to understand, like our bodies crave light after being kept in the dark. As a free man, you studied the seven liberal arts for their own sake…
How to Become Human
The seven liberal arts were traditionally divided into three humanities and four sciences. Grammar, dialectic, and rhetoric were the humanities; hūmānitātēs meant something like “cultivations,” “refinements,” even “courtesies.” Arithmetic, geometry, music, and astronomy were the scientiæ, the sciences (all, even music, were studied mainly in mathematical terms).
You might think of it as the humanities as making you pleasant to talk with, while the sciences give you something to talk about.
The four sciences are still interesting to this day, but — aside from the grounding in mathematics that they represent — they are also more malleable, even replaceable. If you exchanged astronomy for geology, or music for physics, you’d still be getting essentially the same kind and caliber of education.
The same thing is not true of the humanities. They have to come first — not because science is unimportant, but because the humanities teach students how to use language; and all knowledge, even mathematical knowledge, is conveyed through language.
So, what are grammar, dialectic, and rhetoric?
Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!