• My Account
  • Communities
  • BillCam
  • About Us
  • Shop
0
DailyClout

Help fund independent journalism.

  • Sign In
  • Home
  • Opinion
    • Outspoken
    • The Drew Allen Show on DailyClout
    • Heart & Mind
    • Investigate Everything
    • Emerald & Naomi
    • Generation Rogue
    • The Liberty Lobbyist
    • The Shannon Joy Show on DailyClout
    • Man in America on DailyClout
    • The Sarah Westall Show on DailyClout
  • Submissions
  • Events
  • Our Story
  • Shop
  • Become a Member!
  • Donate

DailyClout Latest News

Supreme Court May Gut Key Voting Rights Act Protections

August 8, 2025 • by DailyClout

The 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act passed on Wednesday, but its future hangs in the balance as the Supreme Court prepares to review a case that could dismantle one of the law’s core protections. The pending decision may radically shift how race can be considered in redistricting—and whether Black and Hispanic voters continue to receive legal safeguards at the ballot box.

The Voting Rights Act, signed into law by President Lyndon Johnson in 1965, was created to prevent racial discrimination in voting. It prohibited state and local governments from enacting laws that suppress minority voter turnout and encouraged fair redistricting to enhance minority representation.

But in 2024, the protections that drove voter registration among Southern Black communities from 30% to over 50% are under legal fire. Last week, the Supreme Court agreed to hear a Louisiana case that challenges whether drawing congressional districts to empower minority voters is unconstitutional under the 14th and 15th Amendments.

At the heart of the dispute is Louisiana v. Callais, where state lawmakers redrew congressional maps after a federal court found that their original district lines diluted Black voting power. In response, the Legislature added a second majority-Black district—only to be sued by a group of white voters claiming it constituted racial gerrymandering.

The plaintiffs argue that any race-based consideration in redistricting is unconstitutional, regardless of whether it aims to correct historical disenfranchisement. They claim it violates the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, which guarantees that all citizens receive equal treatment under the law. The Court’s conservative majority appears open to that argument, having issued an order to consider whether such districts violate constitutional protections.

If the Supreme Court sides with the plaintiffs, it could limit how lawmakers nationwide use race as a factor in creating voting districts—potentially reducing the number of Black and Hispanic elected officials and reinforcing the power of state legislatures over federal oversight.

Civil rights groups such as the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the Brennan Center for Justice have expressed alarm. In a statement on the Voting Rights Act anniversary, the NAACP said, “Black people’s political power is under severe threat, and the legitimacy of our democracy is undermined as a result.”

This isn’t the first time the Roberts Court has chipped away at the Voting Rights Act. In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the Court struck down the preclearance requirement, which forced states with a history of voter suppression to obtain federal approval before changing voting laws. Then in Brnovich v. DNC (2021), it became harder to challenge voting restrictions unless proof of racial intent could be clearly established.

In response, Democrats have proposed the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which would reinstate key provisions of the original law and limit states’ ability to pass restrictive voting laws. But the legislation remains stalled in Congress.

As the Supreme Court prepares to hear Louisiana v. Callais—potentially in October—the future of one of America’s most transformative civil rights laws is once again in the Court’s hands.

DailyClout.IO will continue to follow this story. Source article posted here. 

Please Support Our Sponsors:

The Wellness Company:

https://dailyclouthealth.com

Use code OUTSPOKEN for 10% off!

BloodFlow-7: Want better energy, focus, stamina, and heart health—naturally? BloodFlow-7 boosts nitric oxide by 230% to help you feel younger, stronger, and sharper with just one daily dose. Learn more at https://www.bloodflow7.com/DailyClout

NativePath: “7 Reasons Why Men & Women Over 50 Are Adding This Single Ingredient To Their Morning Routine. Visit https://getnativepath.com/DailyClout to Learn More…”

Order ‘The Pfizer Papers’ and Support Our Historic Work: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1648210376?&tag=skyhorsepub-20

Discover LegiSector! Stay up-to-date on issues you care about with LegiSector’s state-of-the-art summarizing capabilities and customizable portals. Try now for a free trial…Learn more at https://www.legisector.com

Spread the Word

Subscribe to DailyClout so you never miss an update!

Spread the Word

  • Please support DailyClout.io. Our research, our uncompromising, fact-based journalism, our compelling opinion pieces and videos, our BillCam platform that lets you pass good bills and stop bad bills, and our lawsuits to preserve medical freedom and secure accountability for wrongdoers, have all helped to keep America and countries around the world safer and freer. We need your donations to keep fighting for you and your loved ones. We cannot do any of it without you and your generous support. Please give what you can as a one-time donation, or please, if you can, send us a monthly recurring donation. Please put resources behind the values you support, and that we do so much to help you defend.

    Thank you.

  • $0.00

14th Amendment civil rights John Lewis Voting Rights Act Louisiana v. Callais minority voting rights NAACP redistricting Shelby County v. Holder supreme court Voting Rights Act
Previous StoryCalifornia Hospital Sued for Concealing Stillbirth Spike Linked to COVID-19 Vaccines
Next StoryCalifornia’s AB 495: A Trojan Horse for State Control Over Your Children?

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of strategy (34)
    Two More Plead Guilty in Texas Antifa Terror Case Thursday, 4, Dec
  • Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of strategy (33)
    Feds Investigate School for Vaccinating Child Without Consent Thursday, 4, Dec
  • Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of strategy (32)
    Supreme Court Stops Judge’s Order Allowing Vaccine Exemptions Thursday, 4, Dec
  • Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of strategy (31)
    EQUALS Act Passes Oversight: Federal Tenure on the Chopping Block Wednesday, 3, Dec
  • Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of Copy of strategy (30)
    The Great Vaccine Shake-Up of 2025 Wednesday, 3, Dec

Blog Archive

Subscribe to Our Free Newsletter

  • About Us
  • Advertise With DailyClout
  • Become a Member
  • BillCam
  • Communities
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Submissions
  • Substack
  • Privacy Policy
View Cart Checkout Continue Shopping
Do you really want to logout of DailyClout?
Yes

You are now leaving DailyClout...