A Letter to California Attorney General on Vaccine Adverse Events

May 2, 2022 

Attorney General Bonta Office of Attorney General PO Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244

DUPLICATE COPY FAXED TO 916-323-5341

RE: California’s Mandatory Covid-19 vaccine and boosters for school children

Attorney General: 

Due to the great public interest, public safety and health issues, and infringement of Constitutional rights posed by forced vaccine mandates for California school children, this issue has risen to a top priority level. Since the Great Barrington Declaration signing on October 4, 2020, resistance to prematurely approved, mandatory injections has grown exponentially. The court-ordered release of more than 55,000 pages of Pfizer documents has provided additional verification of concerns previously stated by doctors, epidemiologists and other health professionals throughout the world. As evidence mounts against the safety of the vaccines, especially to children, claims of fraud, child endangerment, unfair and deceptive acts and practices, and product liability issues continue to rise. With the continuing downward age-spiral of FDA approvals for emergency authorization (EAU) to now include five-year-olds, with clinical trials beginning for those six months to four years, the California Attorney General’s Office needs to step-into the-gap, stay the requirement of mandatory vaccines for school aged children, and begin criminal and/or civil investigations based on facts and causes of action stated herein.

The first category listed below includes issues raised by hundreds of medical and legal professionals associated with the Pfizer Document Analysis Project directed by Dr. Wolf, DailyClout.io, who have been analyzing the Pfizer documents released under court order; to date there are 2500 volunteers and 250 attorneys involved in this review. These medical professionals include biostatisticians, scientists, medical researchers, doctors and immunologists familiar with the FDA approval process. This list continues to grow and is not all inclusive. The second category consists of articles or research studies concerning vaccine adverse reactions among children. Information provided is a launching point for your office to begin investigations.

PFIZER DOCUMENTS ANALYSIS:

1. The design of the mRNA vaccine utilized two proline substitutions to stabilize the spike protein molecule is flawed and the protein molecule and mRNA itself remain unstable. The spike protein has been shown to cause disease, therefore, a vaccine based on the spike protein will promote pathogenesis, not prevent it. The S1 subunit of the spike protein has been shown to shed into the circulatory system, thereby furthering disease. Pfizer did not address the well-documented pathogenesis caused by the coronavirus spike protein before release of their vaccine and before FDA approval. In effect, the spike vaccine not only injects the spike protein into the patient, but converts the cells into “spike protein factories” which can cause illness and damage to major organs. Pfizer did not address the shedding of the coronavirus spike protein into the circulatory system where it crosses over to multiple organ systems to cause pathogenesis, before release of their vaccine. https://phmpt.org/wp content/uploads2022/03/125742 S1 M2 24nonclinical-overview.pdf

2. Of the four different dosages, there is no accounting for weight differences among categories of subjects when dosing because the categories are age-based only. Thus, a 140 pound 17-year-old would receive the same dosage as a 200 pound 45-year-old, weight not being a consideration, which leads to reckless dosing and most dangerous to youths.
3. Pfizer documents released on April 1, 2022 show that Pfizer knew by February of 2021 that there had been a large number of adverse events from the BNT16212 vaccine, which had acquired FDA emergency authorization, in the three prior months. The adverse event numbers were so abundant, even anticipating additional adverse events in the future, that Pfizer advised the FDA they would hire 2400 additional staffers to deal with the paperwork and data processing. It appears that not only was the public not informed of the extent of the adverse effects, but the FDA still granted emergency use of the BNT16262 vaccine knowing of the large number of adverse effects. 5.3.6 postmarketingexperience.pdf., reissue 5.3.6postmarketingexperience.pdf. Because the State of California relies on the FDA for its decision to mandatorily vaccinate school age children, this is potential fraud that needs investigation.
4. An analysis of adverse events reported after the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was approved by the FDA show 78% had known outcomes with 22% unknown; fully one quarter of subjects cannot be determined to have recovered or deceased. 71% are female, but only 22% are male with another 7% having no sex identified; this is very troubling because the CDC states that male adolescents and young adults have the most cases of myocarditis and pericarditis reported. Sadly, 3.7% of patients with known outcomes died; but because Pfizer redacted the number of doses shipped worldwide, a true accounting of deaths is unknown. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
5. Pfizer internal documents list no muscular or neurological side-effects, which does not match external documents.
6. By December 2020, Pfizer knew of the side effects, i.e., that the efficacy of the vaccine was waning and needed boosters, but they waited until May 2021 to inform that the vaccine had a waning effect. Pfizer 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Effects. It appears that FDA gave authorization, knowing these negative issues. Because the State of California relies on the FDA for its decision to mandatorily vaccinate school age children, this is potential fraud that needs investigation.
7. Almost nine pages of Adverse Events of Special Interest, were manifest in the vaccine trials including the most serious of myocarditis, pericarditis, neurological disorders and deep vein thrombosis (blood clotting). A total of almost nine pages of Adverse Events were included in Appendix 1. 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF–07302048 (BNT 162B2N) Received through 28 Feb 2021.) It is notable that none of this has been reported by major networks news outlets to inform the public.

ADDITIONAL SOURCES; 

1. BioNTech, a German company that holds the Pfizer vaccine patent, has recently entered into a joint venture with Fosun Pharma, a global Chinese company based in Wuhan, for $100 million where BioNTech will provide technical advice and Fosun will produce the vaccine in Chin An investigation is needed to determine if overseas ingredients are used in these vaccines due to possible safety issues and/or violation of FDA or California health and safety regulations. The fact that the production lab is located in Wuhan, China, the geographical origin of the pandemic, makes this of utmost importance.
2. BioNTech and Pfizer have received FDA emergency use (EAU) of their vaccine booster doses to children 5 through 11. FDA emergency use authorization will shield Pfizer from liability and appears to be an untested booster using children as subjects in ongoing trials.
3. FDA inspection in 2019-2020 of the McPherson facility producing Pfizer vaccines was found to be non-sterile with repeat quality offenses, having mold and bacteria present; yet the vaccines were still released to the public, possibly being used or will be used on California school children. One can only wonder how many other non-sterile plants are providing Pfizer vaccines in the U.S. or other countries.
4. The April 2022 issue of the Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, presented an article showing that after receiving the Pfizer vaccine, adolescent girls aged 12 to 15 years old were diagnosed with rare valvar aphthous ulcers after the second dose of Pfizer messenger shot.
5. A recently published article in Scientific Reports on April 28, 2022, reports that from 2019 to 2021 an Israel National Emergency Medical Services (EMS) study found an increase of 25% emergency cardiovascular events for the 16 – 39-year-old population during the vaccine rollout and third Covid-19 wave.

Children are at a near zero Covid risk due to their natural immunity which far exceeds the risk of an untested vaccine. The vaccine has been proven to not prevent transmission. Numerous signatories of the Great Barrington Declaration; multiple medical professionals, including opinions of Dr. Malone, epidemiologist and pioneer of mRNA technology, and Dr. McCullough, heart specialist, to name only two, have consistently been proven correct in their medical opinions against the vaccine as evidence grows of the dangers of this shot. Most concerning are Pfizer documents themselves when exposed to analysis and the light of examination.

The currently imposed delay by Governor Newsom of mandated vaccines for California school children is a first step to stop the forcible injection of a dangerous vaccine on children who may suffer lifetime medical issues as a result. However, at the very least, a stay of use of both Pfizer, and other vaccines such as Moderna, is imperative until safety can be assured. The FDA has clearly lost sight of an independent mission to protect the public. Legal actions on the grounds of child endangerment (PC 273(a); fraud or misrepresentation (CC 1710, CC1572); and product safety, appear to be the most relevant causes of action and investigation toward that end needs to begin now to protect children.

Please advise me of your position on the above-stated issues within the next 20 days.

Sincerely,

Virginia Stewart, Attorney