85R22596 AJZ-D     By: Smithee, Moody, Canales, et al. H.B. No. 34       A BILL TO BE ENTITLED   AN ACT   relating to measures to prevent wrongful convictions.          BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:   SECTION 1.  Chapter 2, Code of Criminal Procedure, is   amended by adding Articles 2.023 and 2.32 to read as follows:          Art. 2.023.  TRACKING USE OF CERTAIN TESTIMONY. (a) In this   article:                (1)  "Attorney representing the state" means a district   attorney, a criminal district attorney, or a county attorney with   criminal jurisdiction.                (2)  "Correctional facility" has the meaning assigned   by Section 1.07, Penal Code.          (b)  An attorney representing the state shall track:                (1)  the use of proffered testimony of a person to whom   a defendant made a statement against the defendant's interest while   the person was imprisoned or confined in the same correctional   facility as the defendant, regardless of whether the testimony is   presented at trial; and                (2)  any benefits offered or provided to a person in   exchange for testimony described by Subdivision (1).          Art. 2.32.  ELECTRONIC RECORDING OF CUSTODIAL   INTERROGATIONS. (a) In this article:                (1)  "Electronic recording" means an audio or   audiovisual electronic recording that begins at the time the person   being interrogated enters the area of the place of detention in   which the interrogation will take place and that continues until   the time the interrogation ceases.                (2)  "Place of detention" means a police station or   other building that is a place of operation for a law enforcement   agency, including a municipal police department or county sheriff's   department, and is owned or operated by the law enforcement agency   for the purpose of detaining individuals in connection with the   suspected violation of a penal law. The term does not include a   courthouse.          (b)  A law enforcement agency shall make an electronic   recording of any custodial interrogation that is of a person   suspected of committing or charged with the commission of a felony   offense and that the law enforcement agency conducts in a place of   detention.          (c)  An electronic recording of a custodial interrogation   that complies with this article is exempt from public disclosure as   provided by Section 552.108, Government Code.          SECTION 2.  Article 38.075, Code of Criminal Procedure, is   amended by adding Subsection (c) to read as follows:          (c)  Evidence of a prior offense committed by a person who   gives testimony described by Subsection (a) may be admitted for the   purpose of impeachment if the person received a benefit described   by Article 39.14(h-1)(2) with respect to the offense, regardless of   whether the person was convicted of the offense.          SECTION 3.  Section 3, Article 38.20, Code of Criminal   Procedure, is amended by amending Subsection (c) and adding   Subsection (d) to read as follows:          (c)  The model policy or any other policy adopted by a law   enforcement agency under Subsection (a) must:                (1)  be based on:                      (A)  credible field, academic, or laboratory   research on eyewitness memory;                      (B)  relevant policies, guidelines, and best   practices designed to reduce erroneous eyewitness identifications   and to enhance the reliability and objectivity of eyewitness   identifications; and                      (C)  other relevant information as appropriate;   and                (2)  include [address] the following information   regarding evidence-based practices [topics]:                      (A)  procedures for selecting [the selection of]   photograph and live lineup filler photographs or participants to   ensure that the photographs or participants:                            (i)  are consistent in appearance with the   description of the alleged perpetrator that was provided by a   witness; and                            (ii)  do not make the suspect noticeably   stand out;                      (B)  instructions given to a witness before   conducting a photograph or live lineup identification procedure   that must include a statement that the person who committed the   offense may or may not be present in the procedure and that the   investigation will continue regardless of whether the witness   identifies a person in the procedure;                      (C)  procedures for documenting and preserving    the [documentation and preservation of] results of a photograph or   live lineup identification procedure, including the documentation   of witness statements, regardless of the outcome of the procedure;                      (D)  procedures for administering a photograph or   live lineup identification procedure to an illiterate person or a   person with limited English language proficiency;                      (E)  for a live lineup identification procedure,   [if practicable,] procedures for assigning an administrator who is   unaware of which member of the live lineup is the suspect in the   case [or alternative procedures designed to prevent opportunities   to influence the witness];                      (F)  for a photograph identification procedure,   procedures for assigning an administrator who is capable of   administering a photograph array in a blind manner or in a manner   consistent with other proven or supported best practices designed   to prevent opportunities to influence the witness; and                      (G)  any other procedures or best practices   supported by credible research or commonly accepted as a means to   reduce erroneous eyewitness identifications and to enhance the   objectivity and reliability of eyewitness identifications.          (d)  A witness who makes an identification based on a   photograph or live lineup identification procedure shall be asked   immediately after the procedure to state, in the witness's own   words, the witness's level of confidence in making the   identification.  A law enforcement agency shall document in   accordance with Subsection (c)(2)(C) any statement made under this   subsection.          SECTION 4.  Section 5, Article 38.20, Code of Criminal   Procedure, is amended to read as follows:          Sec. 5.  (a)  Any evidence or expert testimony presented by   the state or the defendant on the subject of eyewitness   identification is admissible only subject to compliance with the   Texas Rules of Evidence.  Except as provided by Subsection (c),   evidence [Evidence] of compliance with the model policy or any   other policy adopted under this article [or with the minimum   requirements of this article] is not a condition precedent to the   admissibility of an out-of-court eyewitness identification.          (b)  Notwithstanding Article 38.23 as that article relates   to a violation of a state statute and except as provided by   Subsection (c), a failure to conduct a photograph or live lineup   identification procedure in substantial compliance with the model   policy or any other policy adopted under this article [or with the   minimum requirements of this article] does not bar the admission of   eyewitness identification testimony in the courts of this state.          (c)  If a witness makes an in-court identification of the   accused, the eyewitness identification is admissible into evidence   against the accused only if the evidence is accompanied by:                (1)  the details of any prior identification made of   the accused by the witness, including the manner in which that   identification procedure was conducted; and                (2)  evidence showing the witness's confidence level as   described by the witness at the time of the prior identification.          SECTION 5.  Section 1, Article 38.22, Code of Criminal   Procedure, is amended to read as follows:          Sec. 1.  In this article:                (1)  "Electronic recording" has the meaning assigned by   Article 2.32.                (2)  "Written [, a written] statement" [of an accused]   means:                      (A) [(1)]  a statement made by the accused in the   accused's [his] own handwriting; or                      (B) [(2)]  a statement made in a language the   accused can read or understand that:                            (i) [(A)]  is signed by the accused; or                            (ii) [(B)]  bears the mark of the accused,   if the accused is unable to write and the mark is witnessed by a   person other than a peace officer.          SECTION 6.  Sections 3(a) and (b), Article 38.22, Code of   Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows:          (a)  Except as provided by Section 9, no oral, sign language,   or written statement made as a result of a custodial interrogation   of a person accused of a felony offense is admissible against the   accused in a criminal proceeding, and no [No] oral or sign language   statement made as a result of a custodial interrogation of a person   [of an] accused of any other offense is [made as a result of   custodial interrogation shall be] admissible against the accused in   a criminal proceeding, unless:                (1)  an electronic recording [, which may include   motion picture, video tape, or other visual recording,] is made of   the custodial interrogation [statement];                (2)  after being [prior to the statement but during the   recording the accused is] given the warning described by Section   2(a), [in Subsection (a) of Section 2 above and] the accused   knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waives any rights set out   in the warning;                (3)  the recording device was capable of making an   accurate recording, the operator was competent, and the recording   is accurate and has not been altered;                (4)  all voices on the recording are identified; and                (5)  not later than the 20th day before the date of the   proceeding, the attorney representing the defendant is provided   with a true, complete, and accurate copy of all recordings of the   defendant made under this article.          (b)  Every electronic recording of [any statement made by an   accused during] a custodial interrogation of an accused must be   preserved until such time as the defendant's conviction for any   offense relating thereto is final, all direct appeals therefrom are   exhausted, or the prosecution of such offenses is barred by law.          SECTION 7.  Article 38.22, Code of Criminal Procedure, is   amended by adding Section 9 to read as follows:          Sec. 9.  An oral, sign language, or written statement of an   accused made as a result of a custodial interrogation is admissible   without an electronic recording otherwise required by Section 3(a)   if the attorney introducing the statement shows good cause for the   lack of the recording. For purposes of this section, "good cause"   includes:                (1)  the accused refused to respond to questioning or   cooperate in a custodial interrogation of which an electronic   recording was made, provided that:                      (A)  a contemporaneous recording of the refusal   was made; or                      (B)  the peace officer or agent of the law   enforcement agency conducting the interrogation attempted, in good   faith, to record the accused's refusal but the accused was   unwilling to have the refusal recorded, and the peace officer or   agent contemporaneously, in writing, documented the refusal;                (2)  the statement was not made exclusively as the   result of a custodial interrogation, including a statement that was   made spontaneously by the accused and not in response to a question   by a peace officer;                (3)  the peace officer or agent of the law enforcement   agency conducting the interrogation attempted, in good faith, to   record the interrogation but the recording equipment did not   function, the officer or agent inadvertently operated the equipment   incorrectly, or the equipment malfunctioned or stopped operating   without the knowledge of the officer or agent;                (4)  exigent public safety concerns prevented or   rendered infeasible the making of an electronic recording of the   custodial interrogation; or                (5)  the peace officer or agent of the law enforcement   agency conducting the interrogation reasonably believed at the time   the interrogation began that the accused was not taken into custody   for or being interrogated concerning the commission of a felony   offense.          SECTION 8.  Article 39.14, Code of Criminal Procedure, is   amended by adding Subsection (h-1) to read as follows:          (h-1)  In this subsection, "correctional facility" has the   meaning assigned by Section 1.07, Penal Code. Notwithstanding any   other provision of this article, if the state intends to use at a   defendant's trial testimony of a person to whom the defendant made a   statement against the defendant's interest while the person was   imprisoned or confined in the same correctional facility as the   defendant, the state shall disclose to the defendant:                (1)  the person's complete criminal history, including   any charges that were dismissed or reduced as part of a plea   bargain;                (2)  any grant, promise, or offer of immunity from   prosecution, reduction of sentence, or other leniency or special   treatment, given by the state in exchange for the person's   testimony;                (3)  information concerning other criminal cases in   which the person has testified, or offered to testify, against a   defendant with whom the person was imprisoned or confined,   including any grant, promise, or offer as described by Subdivision   (2) given by the state in exchange for the testimony; and                (4)  other information in the possession, custody, or   control of the state that is relevant to the person's credibility.          SECTION 9.  Section 1701.253, Occupations Code, is amended   by adding Subsection (n) to read as follows:          (n)  As part of the minimum curriculum requirements, the   commission shall establish a statewide comprehensive education and   training program on eyewitness identification, including the   variables that affect a witness's vision and memory, practices for   minimizing contamination, and effective eyewitness identification   protocols.   SECTION 10.  STUDY REGARDING USE OF DRUG FIELD TEST KITS.   (a) The Texas Forensic Science Commission shall conduct a study   regarding the use of drug field test kits by law enforcement   agencies in this state. The commission shall:                (1)  evaluate the quality, accuracy, and reliability of   drug field test kits;                (2)  identify any common problems with drug field test   kits;                (3)  evaluate the availability and adequacy of training   for law enforcement officers regarding the use of drug field test   kits and the interpretation of the test results; and                (4)  develop legislative recommendations regarding the   use of drug field test kits by law enforcement agencies and   regarding related training for law enforcement officers.          (b)  Not later than December 1, 2018, the Texas Forensic   Science Commission shall submit to the governor, the lieutenant   governor, and each member of the legislature a written report that   summarizes the results of the study conducted under this section   and includes any legislative recommendations.          SECTION 11.  CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION STUDY. (a) The Texas   Forensic Science Commission shall conduct a study regarding the   manner in which crime scene investigations are conducted in this   state. The commission shall:                (1)  evaluate the standard procedures used in   processing a crime scene and evaluate the quality of crime scene   investigations;                (2)  evaluate the availability and adequacy of the   training or continuing education provided to crime scene   investigators; and                (3)  develop legislative recommendations regarding   improvements to crime scene investigation procedures and training.          (b)  Not later than December 1, 2018, the Texas Forensic   Science Commission shall submit to the governor, the lieutenant   governor, and each member of the legislature a written report that   summarizes the results of the study conducted under this section   and includes any legislative recommendations.          SECTION 12.  Article 2.32 and Section 9, Article 38.22, Code   of Criminal Procedure, as added by this Act, and Sections 1 and 3,   Article 38.22, Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended by this Act,   apply to the use of a statement made as a result of a custodial   interrogation that occurs on or after the effective date of this   Act, regardless of whether the criminal offense giving rise to that   interrogation is committed before, on, or after the effective date   of this Act.          SECTION 13.  Article 38.075(c), Code of Criminal Procedure,   as added by this Act, applies to the admissibility of evidence in a   criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective date   of this Act. The admissibility of evidence in a criminal proceeding   that commences before the effective date of this Act is governed by   the law in effect on the date the proceeding commenced, and the   former law is continued in effect for that purpose.          SECTION 14.  (a)  Section 3(d), Article 38.20, Code of   Criminal Procedure, as added by this Act, applies only to a   photograph or live lineup identification procedure conducted on or   after the effective date of this Act, regardless of whether the   offense to which the procedure is related was committed before, on,   or after the effective date of this Act.          (b)  Section 5, Article 38.20, Code of Criminal Procedure, as   amended by this Act, applies only to the trial of an offense with   respect to which a prior identification of the accused occurred on   or after the effective date of this Act, regardless of whether the   offense that is the subject of the trial was committed before, on,   or after the effective date of this Act.          SECTION 15.  Article 39.14(h-1), Code of Criminal Procedure,   as added by this Act, applies to the prosecution of an offense   committed on or after the effective date of this Act. The   prosecution of an offense committed before the effective date of   this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was   committed, and the former law is continued in effect for that   purpose. For purposes of this section, an offense is committed   before the effective date of this Act if any element of the offense   occurs before the effective date.          SECTION 16.  Not later than January 1, 2018, the Texas   Commission on Law Enforcement shall establish the eyewitness   identification education and training program as required by   Section 1701.253(n), Occupations Code, as added by this Act.          SECTION 17.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2017.