DailyClout
0
  • Home
  • Billcam
  • Campaigns
  • Submissions
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Become a Member!
  • Login/Sign Up
  • Home
  • Billcam
  • Campaigns
  • Submissions
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Donate
  • Become a Member!
  • Login/Sign Up
  • All Posts
  • Bulletin Board
  • Opinion
  • Pfizer Analysis
  • Hot Bills
  • Videos
  • Dr. Naomi Wolf’s Outspoken
  • The Mindful Activist
  • Sponsored Content
  • Press Releases
  • Contributors

DailyClout Opinion Pfizer Reports
Opinion

Report 54: Infants and Children Under 12 Given the Pfizer mRNA COVID “Vaccine” Seven Months BEFORE Pediatric Approval. 71% of Adverse Event Cases Classified as Serious.

January 31, 2023 • by Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt

The War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) – Barbara Gehrett, MD; Joseph Gehrett, MD; Chris Flowers, MD; and Loree Britt – produced a shocking review of the pediatric data found in Pfizer document 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) Received Through 28-FEB-2021 (a.k.a., “5.3.6“).

It is important to note 1) that the adverse events (AEs) in the 5.3.6 document were reported to Pfizer for only a 90-day period starting on December 1, 2020, the date of the United Kingdom’s public rollout of Pfizer’s COVID-19 experimental mRNA “vaccine” product and 2) no pediatric dose of the Pfizer product was approved for use during that time frame.

What dose(s) of Pfizer’s mRNA “vaccine” was given to these children since no approved dose existed?

Important points from this report include:

  • A seven-year-old experienced a stroke.
  • One child and one infant suffered facial paralysis.
  • One infant had a kidney adverse event, either kidney injury or failure.
  • Of the 34 adverse event cases, 24 (71%) were classified as serious.
  • Predominantly female patients were affected — at least 25 of 34 (73.5%) patients.
  • Table 6 reports 34 cases of use in pediatric individuals. However, 28 additional cases were excluded because details such as height and weight were “not consistent with pediatric subjects.”
  • Ages ranged from two months to nine years, with median 4.0 years, which means half the children were under four years of age.
  • 132 adverse events were reported in the 34 children – i.e., an average of 3.88 AEs per child.

 

Shockingly, Pfizer concluded:

“No new significant safety information was identified based on a review of these cases compared with the non-paediatric population.”

 

Please read the disturbing, two-page report by the Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) below.

Post Marketing Team Pediatrics MicroReport

https://dailyclout.io/wp-content/uploads/Post-Marketing-Team-Pediatrics-MicroReport.pdf

Please support DailyClout!

Become a DailyClout Member.

Spread the love
This DailyClout article is the writer’s opinion.
One of our country’s most important freedoms is that of free speech.
Agree with this essay? Disagree? Join the debate by writing to DailyClout HERE.
Spread the love
#Pfizer #Safety adverse events babies Bell's Palsy boys children drug safety facial paralysis girls kidney kids mrna mrna vaccine mrna vaccines pediatric pfizer docs Pfizer documents Pfizer Documents Analysis Reports renal stroke vaccine safety
Previous StoryPoll: In Wake of Public Prayer for NFL Player Damar Hamlin, Two-Thirds of Voters Say Public Calls for Prayer are Effective
Next StoryMeet the 3500 Heroes Who Volunteered Their Time to Expose the Most Heinous Crime in Modern History

36 replies added

  1. TRM January 31, 2023 Reply

    How many children total were injected? I see the 34 with adverse events but not the total.
    Thanks

    • TRM January 31, 2023 Reply

      I see it was 34 that they’ve admitted to. So that would be the total. Disregard my previous message.
      Thanks

    • Stone Ranger February 1, 2023 Reply

      34 plus 28 that were vaccinated that were excluded from the results due to height or weight. We can ASSUME similar devastating side effects occurred

    • Brian Davis February 1, 2023 Reply

      God Bless you all, for the fine work exposing these evil psychotic murders. Pfe is criminal and the Fda are the executioners

    • Lucius February 1, 2023 Reply

      When do the military tribunals begin. Yesterday was much too late.

    • tony mccoy February 2, 2023 Reply

      where do they get the children to use as guenie pigs

    • TRM March 11, 2023 Reply

      From the document on phmpt.org on page 7 we see this:
      Age range (years): ≤ 17 a
      …
      a. in 46 cases reported age was <16-year-old and in 34 cases <12-year-old

  2. Patience Do Good February 1, 2023 Reply

    From my knowledge in reviewing pfizer docs and by a phone call with them. In the pregnant studies if a woman was pregnant and had an adverse reaction and that baby died, it was classified as, “Resolved on its own or Resolved. Meaning you were pregnant, you had a severe reaction and the baby died so it’s no longer a problem.

    I’m pretty sure when they say resolved…. they died.

  3. D3F1ANT February 1, 2023 Reply

    And no punishment for any of these Covid criminals…not for the so-called experts, scientists, doctors, or politicians.

  4. Candace February 1, 2023 Reply

    Staying vigilant and thank you for the extremely important information

  5. Vincent Oliveri February 1, 2023 Reply

    So many questions. Why were children given this product in December, 2020? How many children were in the sample? How many 7 -year-olds normally have strokes? How many babies normally suffer from kidney disease or failure? These seem like rare occurrences. The criminality of what these companies have done–of what our governments have condoned–it is incomprehensible. Evil is the only word I have for this.

  6. Dr Chris Flowers MD February 2, 2023 Reply

    The key here is that children should NOT have been receiving the vaccine (especially the full adult dose) way before the children’s vaccine dose was formulated and approved. In fact, there were also 12 children injected in the Pfizer Clinical Trial, none of who should have been jabbed. It was against protocol and should have been prosecuted for putting children at risk

  7. Marie Gergenti February 2, 2023 Reply

    You do not talk about who is children were injected. Where did you get these children from? I find it difficult to believe. Parents gave them permission for this.

  8. No Amnesty February 2, 2023 Reply

    NO AMNESTY.

  9. Skeeve February 2, 2023 Reply

    Albert Bourla and Tony Fauci are criminals who must be tried, sentenced, and executed. This so-called “vaccine”, is worse than the Thalidomide disaster of the 1960’s. A 7-year old gets a stroke!? ARE YOU EFFING KIDDING ME?

  10. Eric J Bilderback February 2, 2023 Reply

    Need to know the total amount of kids. 34 out of 10,000 or out of 100? Big difference seems like you may be trying to over play this.

    • FillyG February 15, 2023 Reply

      They are being very direct. You just don’t read well. The total was 34 + 28 = 62. 28 were dropped from. analysis because of missing information, leaving 34 children with 132 AEs.

  11. Schmergenblergen February 2, 2023 Reply

    I never understand why parents put kids in any of these trials. They test different dosing amounts, which means some kids get the wrong dose.

  12. Steve February 2, 2023 Reply

    These vaccines are nothing more that depopulation tools. Right, Mr.Gates?

  13. Davina February 2, 2023 Reply

    TRM. The Pharma, medical and legal side of the health care business have laws and standards and ethics they must abide by. They blew past all of those. 34 children, is 34 children. If it was out of 1 million, 1 billion, or just 35, it wouldn’t matter. First, they covered it up, so that should be a clue 2. 35 side effects of this seriousness and causation would and should have led to the drug being pulled from the market, and the test stopped. Previous examples, such as the flu shot of 1976 would let us know that these side effects are way too serious for the amount of risk the children were actually exposed to with catching Covid. They were not at risk. As far as protecting others, it is immoral, and insane, and unethical to put children at risk to save the elderly. We have never done that before medically, but we did this time. Why? Where were our doctors? Not the TV doctors, or the famous doctors, but our own personal General Practitioners and surgeons and nurses, who we get to see in our normal lives. The ones charged with looking after us and to first do no harm. Where were they? What happened there, and what confidence can I have in them in the future? Can we sue the Insurance Companies for back pay for not having protected us, when that was what we signed up to? Why can’t we, and who made that decision on our behalf and against our basic human rights? We are talking reparations for injuries incurred in 1864, for people who did not experience slavery, yet we are not compensating injuries committed by the government that have happened today. Do this generation of doctors know the corrupt and dystopian world they are leaving for us as a legacy?

  14. Bocomo February 2, 2023 Reply

    These parents have USED their children for experimentation for their own woke crap and ruined their lives. They are the biggest culprits. They were supposed to protect their kids, instead they used them.

  15. Nikki Scott February 2, 2023 Reply

    I see 54 in the total infants and children given the MRNA vaccine

  16. Alain Schollaert February 2, 2023 Reply

    In France, they injected some 50000 adult doses on some 30000 children, less than 12 years old in 2021.

  17. Stinky February 2, 2023 Reply

    It’s too bad it’s just the children that suffered, and not the parents and medical ‘professionals’ that used them as guinnea pigs.

  18. C3OP February 2, 2023 Reply

    When reading this I am reminded of the scene in Slumdog Millionaires where hot oil is used to blind the beggar boy for evil men’s profit

  19. JoeBlowSmith February 2, 2023 Reply

    The parents should be charges with child abuse and have tge kids taken away

  20. Bob February 2, 2023 Reply

    Why is the gettr linked page removed?
    I thought gettr was censor-free speech?

  21. John Calvin Jones, PhD, JD February 2, 2023 Reply

    These parents did not want to HELP their children, they wanted to kill them.

    • D.Cali February 14, 2023 Reply

      J,
      老师您好
      I always respected your passionate disdain of bad parenting & Disney.

      Happy to note you aren’t in G-tep & still fighting the good v-fight. I knew, just wanted 2 confirm.

      Me??? Dx + Adderall = Stanford & 6fig.
      ∞♡∞
      D

  22. PopulistRight February 2, 2023 Reply

    The total number of children given these experimental gene-therapy injections (they could not have willfully-consented, as children) is not clear to me from this article. The number of adverse-events is near-meaningless without that total.

  23. John February 3, 2023 Reply

    I have a version of the reports with the first 50 reports. How do I get the most recent reports that have come out since my version?

  24. MRT February 3, 2023 Reply

    34 IS THE TOTAL

  25. John shox February 3, 2023 Reply

    Will the real truth ever come out.

  26. Eileen Michaud February 3, 2023 Reply

    Where are they getting these children to test on?? Ukrainian Bioweapons labs?? Is this what’s been going on in Chernobyl

  27. Joab February 8, 2023 Reply

    Is there any way we can get hold of this Report 54?

    • Robin March 23, 2023 Reply

      https://www.phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

(will not be shared)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • The Powerful Politics of COVID Vaccines Thursday, 23, Mar
  • Image Credit: Investing.com
    Americans Face a Rapidly Encroaching ‘Emergency’ CBDC Power Grab Thursday, 23, Mar
  • Screenshot 2023-03-23 8.39.08 PM
    A PRACTICAL IDEA TO SPREAD TRUTH & SAVE THE WORLD Thursday, 23, Mar
  • Screenshot 2023-03-21 at 3.28.38 PM
    “Where’s my cycle?” v. European Commission: Tens of Thousands of European Women Demand Answers Regarding Undesirable Menstrual Effects Following COVID-19 Vaccination. Thursday, 23, Mar
  • Turbo Cancer (4)
    “Turbo Cancer” After mRNA Injection: Dr. Henry Ealy Reveals What He Thinks Is Causing It Wednesday, 22, Mar

Blog Archive

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

  • I agree to receive emails and other content from DailyClout. I understand that I may repeal my consent at any time.

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • BillCam
  • Campaigns
  • About Us
  • Submissions
  • Advertise with Us
  • Events
  • Media Contact
View Cart Checkout
Do you really want to logout of DailyClout?
Yes

You are now leaving DailyClout...